jadester
15-Jan-05
#118355 |  | Rating: 7
it's pretty good but perhaps it needs more of a "wolfish" kinda feel - i'd suggest making her hair waaay longer - more like down to her waist. have a wisp or two either side draped down her front, plus one or two li'l bits visible behind her. |
bandages
28-Jul-03
#47012 |  | Rating: 6
lines of the face need work; i would go ahead and trace what you needed for it. the fact that the hair isn't outlined like the rest of the model is strange, and draws attention to the different technique used for it. body proportions are decent, but i really don't believe that space wolves are used to pubes being shaved. wolves should be hairy. |
vincegamer
07-Nov-02
#18855 |  | Rating: 7
Lips are a bit big and the outline too distinct for something that close to the hair that is not outlined at all.
But it's good. Rather than magazines I suggest you look at tapestries for ideas of what people woven on fabric look like. You're not likely to see as many nudes, but it's not necessary. |
neil thomas
05-Nov-02
#18596 |  | Rating: -
no, im afraid im not some petty tracer, beleave it or not i drew this free hand in about half an hour from a picture in my mind, i was originaly going to have her with her hand on a husky kind of wolf insted of a staff but i thought i might do this one first an if it looked alright then i'll do the wolf next time, i see were your coming from it does look i bit to one side to much but no ones perfiect!! maybe the next one i'll centre her nip a bit more ok! |
Duende
04-Nov-02
#18567 |  | Rating: 7
I think the nipple is a bit northeast of where it should be. Are you using reference material (i.e. girlie magazines)? |
neil thomas
29-Oct-02
#17912 | | Rating: -
yea i wanted this to look as if shes stood on a lit platfom as there would be no real light coming from the night sky, so i reversed the shading and just left the reflection from the stars in the bio-eye normal, as for the crotch, i think any one can gather its i she, i just dident want to go o.t.t and paint more bits and peices if you know what i mean, i thought this would ruin it. |
No Such Agency
28-Oct-02
#17865 |  | Rating: 7
Pretty good freehand! Some of the flesh shading seems "upside down" - the highlights on the _bottoms_ of the breasts for instance. Were you going for a lit-from-below thing? I'm not going to comment on the whole bare crotch thing - except to say that the classical sculptors generally chose the same "discreet" approach you did. |
Jericho
28-Oct-02
#17853 |  | Rating: 6
Hope you're doing something with the crotch, I don't think the boys would rally behind an asexual "it"  Other than that, it's pretty good. |
|
Post A Public Comment |
