chvayre
31-Jul-03
#47522 |  | Rating: -
Thanks for your compliments. In case any of you are still wondering, I don't use this model in 40K. I use it as a Union gravtank in games of VOR, hence, the USAF markings. I also adapted the helmet of the commander to resemble Union headgear. |
MrDelish
22-May-03
#39211 |  | Rating: 8
Ooolala! |
gremlare
14-Sep-02
#13381 |  | Rating: 8
Nice camo! I think it's a human up there, is it? the tatoo on the front is probably an ancient marking found in a cave by the imerial guard... lol. |
nadinbrzezinski
08-Jul-02
#8415 |  | Rating: 10
This is a great model, and I think someobdy is not quite using it for games of 40K only... |
Mahon
17-Jun-02
#6750 |  | Rating: 7
whatever you say I still like this cammo more than standard TAU colour scheme (orange?) |
Coyote
05-Jun-02
#5632 |  | Rating: 8
Perhaps he considers it more of an attack helicopter then a hovertank?
Or maybe he only had USAF decals. |
I am not worthy
23-Apr-02
#3316 |  | Rating: 6
actually if you notice that large ion cannon and the 2 burst cannons that makes it a hammer head not a devil fish. nice lookin kinda odd withthe non tau marking and dud in top. |
Papa Smurf
#2784 |  | Rating: 7
Airbrushing vehicle models always looks good. |
No Such Agency
#2069 |  | Rating: 8
It's a Tau Devilfish hover from GW, not a scratchbuild. Still very nice looking, and an awesome model IMO. The USAF markings are odd, you'd think this would be an Army vehicle (it's a hover, not a gunship), but the "realistic" green camo scheme is very well done! |
Duende
#1206 |  | Rating: 8
Nice paint scheme, but I'm still wondering why the Tau are using Air Force markings??? |
|
View All Comments Post A Public Comment |
