There is a painter here ?? who paints in the reverse - whereas a lot of us paint colors directly on a black primed figure and gradually lighten up a blocked in color (dark blue, blue, light blue), this person starts with a white primed figure and washes in all the shades leaving the white of the primer (which gets tinted in the process) to be the highlights . . .
dang . . what\'s his name . . . ?????
It\'s a neat effect - I\'m too scared to try it.
I wonder if that\'s what you were doing?
When Sturm is talking about thinning a color to milk consistency - note that this is applied in increasingly SMALLER areas - to the higher parts of a mini - the edges.
In a traditional \"wash\" - the paint is applied in the opposite place - in the recesses, in the low parts - this fills the holes (with color) and stains the highlights. A wash also can unify to a small extent the result of regular blends.
I my view though the \"wash\" is significantly thinner. In the blending thing Sturm\'s talking about it has much more coverage capability but it is thin enough to be able to drag the edges of the color into the slightly darker shade below it - this serves to obcscure that edge - that line where the two shades meet. By definition a blend.
Any missteps there Sturm?? (you and I use the same technique)
Bookmarks