Username: Password: Signup Now! | Why join? Lost password?
Back to CoolMiniOrNot
Digital camera photography
Intermediate
Return to article index
Rating: 9.29 Votes: 17
Views: 13440
By: Chern Ann
Category: General Subcategory: PhotographyDate: 2002-04-30 21:31:12
Prev 1 2 3 4 5

Resolution

Technically, photographs of the Internet have no resolution, they merely have a size. Pixels/inch, picas/inch is a printing/scanning term for translating images onto paper. 

Confused? So was I

Let me explain. A 72x72 pixel square image would have 5184 pixels in it. This is an absolute amount of information that does not change. If it were printed out with 1 inch sides, it would be 72 pixels per inch on paper. If it were printed out with 2 inch sides, it would be 36 pixels per inch. If it were printed with 0.5 inch sides it would be 144 pixels per inch. Although the size of the print outs differ, they all have the same number of pixels in them, just packed closer together or more spread out. 

72x72 image. If printed out at 72 dpi (dots per inch) it would occupy 1inch square Same 72x72 image, stretched out to fit a 144x144 space. This is what the image would look like printed out over 2 inches square (ie 36 dpi).  It's a bit blurred because it's still the same 72x72 image stretched out to do the work of a 144x144 image. 144x144 image.  Since it's occupying a 144x144 space, it looks sharp.  If printed out at 72 dpi it would occupy a 2 inch square. If printed out at 36 dpi it would occupy a 4 inch square.

Time to throw away pixels

If you're taking photographs with a digital camera, the resolution doesn't come into play at all. You merely need to decide how much real estate on the webpage you want your image to take up, and then resample the image to that size. 

For example, using my digital S20 my pictures come in at 2048x1536 pixels.  This would roughly be two to three screenfuls for most average web surfers (your computer is probably set at 800x600 or 1024x768 resolution).  I wiill need to resample my image using an image editor to reduce the size by reducing the number of pixels in the image.  A good rule of thumb for "man-sized" figures is 300 to 400 pixels in width*.

From this

To this

This will involve throwing away pixels and information, so if you blow the picture up again to it's original size it will not be as sharp since information is lost.  It is always good to keep a backup of your images with the original number of pixels, in case you need to do close-ups of specific areas later.

Compression

On top of this, JPG (JPEG) files can decrease file sizes by compressing images using built-in algorithms, that make compromises with colour information and image clarity in order to reduce file sizes. The pixel size of the image remains the same, it will however lose more and more colour information as the image is compressed, and may exhibit artifiacts(strange squares, jagged edges) as pixels are rearranged into an optimum position. So you end up with a picture taking up less space, but not looking as good. 

144x144 image with medium compression. 
File size is 15kb
Same image with maximum compression. Note the deteriorated appearance, clarity and the artifacts.  However, file size is only 2kb, an 87% savings in space (and hence transmission times).

If you are using Adobe Photoshop, the way to prepare your images is to choose File, Save for Web, and select a final image size, as well as decide how much compression you wish to apply. If you wish to process several files you can do so using File, Automate, Web Photo Gallery, which does much the same thing, but to all pictures in a directory. This output is saved in a seperate directory from the original, so you can experiment without fear of loss of your pictures. Paintshop Pro also provides similar functionality

Conclusion

Well, that's all. You're on your own.  Happy painting and snapping! 

*I'd recommend a minimum width for a man sized figure (from shoulder to shoulder) of about 300 pixels now, as opposed to 250 to 300 originally stated. The online audience has evolved and is now expecting more detailed images.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5
Dunkle Zeiten
19 June 09
Rating: 10
Exactly what i am looking for. THANX Dude!

Mr Frost
20 May 08
Rating: 7
Good stuff, ill give it a shot.

james9995
24 August 07
Rating: 10
The most informative photography article I have read, thanx a lot Chern Ann!

vincenti
07 February 06
Rating: 10
Wunderbar my liebschun!!!!!!AN OUTSTANDING little article , especially as today I bought my first digital camera ,YIPEE!

Frustrated Father
18 October 04
Rating: 10
This was very, very helpful.

Cocanour
28 May 04
Rating: 10
I need to take better pictures thanks for the info.

Valander
25 March 03
Rating: 9
Thanks, Chern, for this article! It's helped me improve the quality of my picture taking quite a bit. It's funny, too, because I have the exact same lamps you have (gotta love IKEA).

ForPlay
19 March 03
Rating: 10
Ahhhuuummmmmmm....
Thank you so very much. I just became involved in this schtick and am about to invest in a camera. Your information as to this matter was a great enlightening.

docwex
30 September 02
Rating: 9
Great article, hope it still makes sense when I'm shopping for the camera.
Is there any substitute for a tripod? I just don't want another piece of equipment.

JBMallus
26 September 02
Rating: 10
Thanks for the info. I'll be putting it to use right away!

Chaplain Desmodus
04 June 02
Rating: 9
Thanks! I just used this article as input when choosing a digicam (buying one this week, hopefully!). Great information and a good presentation.

McCragge
01 May 02
Rating: 9
This is one of the most informative and easy to read articles I have ever read on photography, thank you Chern, I learned a lot!

Temperance
30 April 02
Rating: 8
I think it should have stressed that natural sunlight was best, but other than that, it's a great article!

You are not logged in.
If you would like to leave a comment and don't have an account, please signup.
You'll get access to Vote tracking so you will never see the same miniature twice (unless you want to) and many other enhancements to your browsing experience.

Start voting!
Recent Articles
Raphael 8404 Vs. Winsor and Newton series 7
- obsidianpainting 4-1
How to make Lava Board Themed Trees
- Menelker 29-12
Telcharion: painting the flesh, robes, textured apron, and building the base
- automaton 22-12
Basic Desert Basing
- steelcult 12-12
Bone-colored Cryx bonejack, step by step
- Pate5 24-10
Nurgle Armor
- Aliengod3 12-8
Recently on the Forums
barbars minnis
- Tagamoga 21-3 10:22am
Oniwaban
- mickc22 21-3 10:11am
Yarry painted by Sven Jonsson aka Avelorn
- Avelorn 21-3 10:03am
BPI WIP
- Tagamoga 21-3 10:03am
Obliterator Conversion
- Tagamoga 21-3 09:56am
Redarmy's Ongoing WIP
- Tagamoga 21-3 09:54am
Recent Blogs
Week 11: Creaky old bones
- Target 20-Mar 06:23am
Deathguard Dread
- pate 18-Mar 01:03pm
Space wolf terminator - WIP
- skeeve 17-Mar 08:48am
CU - First Inhabitants
- Observer 11-Mar 10:18am
Retrouver moi juste à côté
- iwok 4-Mar 11:38am

Add a Shout
Set language:
Theme
Hide Scores
no yes
About
CoolMiniOrNot is the Internets largest gallery of painted wargaming miniatures. Our community submits, shares, comments and exchanges ideas on this fascinating hobby.
Advertise
Submit News
Statistics
Privacy Policy
Terms and Conditions
Contact Us
Copyright © 2001-2010 CoolMiniOrNot Inc.