vincegamer
Active member
Here\'s an interesting first in the legal protection of animals:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/09/01/dog.order.ap/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/09/01/dog.order.ap/index.html
Originally posted by vincegamer
Trouble is, most members of PETA have no idea what they have joined. PETA is a good whipping boy because its ideas are extreme, but the basic idea of ethical treatment of animals is a good one.
Originally posted by MPJ
I\'ll vote for putting a stop to animal testing only if we can start testing on dangerous criminals, perverts, etc.. and people who beat pets.
I\'ll vote for putting a stop to animal testing only if we can start testing on dangerous criminals, perverts, etc..
Originally posted by vincegamer
Another example of an extreme being bad for a cause.
I personally believe that a person should have a right to end his/her own life if there is no chance of recovery from a painful and debilitating fatal illness.
Unfortunately the most vocal advocate for such a scheme, Dr. Kervorkian, was a complete madman.