AndyG WIP (pic heavy)

Digganob

New member
Haha. The next freehand will be crisper you say? If only I could smack you through the Internet lol. Honestly though you make freehand look like its part of the sculpt itself.
 

AndyG

Active member
Now this time I'm determined to have a relaxing paint job! No horses, no should there be boobs/shouldn't there be boobs, no ridiculous amounts of free hand (well maybe a bit) just a plain old 30mm GW old school mini. Valten of Sigmar. Nice bit of metal to do just a bit of a relax before the Gokham paint along starts.
 

Zab

New member
"Yeah i'm just gonna relax (and blow your freaking minds) with a little fun project I'm just mailing in, ya know for fun" :giggle:

Stop saying crap like that! You are giving us all a complex. Oh. Just me then? F___. :neutral:
 
this!

no woman with common scense would wear a plate armor that catch the blow instead of deflecting it. and seriously, making metal cups like that make it look just silly to me. but mostly im kind of sick how women are portrayed in this hobby.

take a look here, must be magic, where did the boobs go??.


anyway Andy, youre on fire! :good:

Women in the US Army have had to wear the same body armor as men since the use of this kind of protection began. The body armor comes in many varieties, but most have consisted of an outer, padded vest which on its own can stop smaller pieces of shrapnel. But the real life-saving part are these plates that are inserted within the vest and are rated to stop up to armor piercing 7.62mm rounds from any range. Women are constantly complaining that the flat nature of these plates crush their breasts and make it difficult to breathe. There are a number of other design flaws that they take issue with as well, and the Army recently responded by making a vest more suited for the female form, with a shorter torso, etc.

IDK, I guess my point is that male armor isn't exactly functional for women, either. In fact, did you know that during the Middle Ages, the absurdity of a woman donning armor was so extreme that there aren't any legitimate, believable sources or accounts from which we can base our notions of female armor? So while "boob plate" armor is very fantastical, it is no more fantastical than a woman wearing armor at all. Therefore, one isn't really taking absurd liberties by portraying a woman in female form-fitting armor, because it is equally absurd to imagine them in a man's suit of armor. And this being an Art form, I prefer the former portrayal, which to me is no more impractical than a woman wearing armor that makes it difficult to breathe in.

"She turned blue and passed out after thirty minutes of combat, but at least no man could penetrate her (armor)."

IMO, the sexy woman in armor bothers me no more than the muscle-bound, bearded barbarian. Both are taking liberties with the subject matter.
 
Last edited:
Back To Top
Top