Here we have a subject bound to set me off on a long-winded tirade.
Where to begin?
I have seen similar threads in the past, here and elsewhere, and it is one of those proverbial powder-kegs.
There are people who feel strongly for the system as it is, and others that think it has become far too lenient.
I am of the latter group.
In an earlier thread here, I saw references to Dr. Spock, and his earlier works that discussed the \'long term drawbacks\' that can be brought about by corporal punishment (ie: spanking). It was also mentioned, correctly, that Dr. Spock has since recanted on that philosophy, citing the difference between an appropriate spanking for excessively bad behaviour and outright abuse.
But Dr. Spock\'s recanting on that early work has been largely ignored by society and the law-makers. Whitney Houston sang \"I believe the children are the future\", and this is true. However, understanding that, we still need to keep in mind that children growing up without limitations or consequences for such serious actions is not going to teach them to be a good future for mankind.
Above, it was stated that the baby boomers have grown up into one of the wealthiest generations, which may be true. I do not know finances. To me, they are irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
Having or not having do not seem to be much involved in who is commiting these crimes. Rich or poor, if you are under 18, you have a very good chance of doing just about anything you want and getting away with it.
This, to me, is the ultimate form of wrong. As adults, it is our job to educate our children. Not just intellectually, but morally. Right and wrong should not depend on how old you are. Action and consequence should not depend on how old you are.
\"What kind of future will child X have if it is known that he assaulted ten little girls when he was fifteen?\" As far as I\'m concerned, child X would have exactly the future he or she deserved if they did such a thing.
When it is personal, when the child lives in your city, you should be able to know who has commited some kind of horrible crime, or conspired to commit one. Conspiracy to commit a murder is a capital crime, I believe (any lawyer may correct me at will if I\'m wrong), and if my child (if I had any) were in school with such a child, I would definitely want to know.
This lack of knowledge can only promote fear-mongering behaviour and paranoia. It leaves parents thinking \'what if it\'s little Joe\'s best friend?\'.
And the onus of teaching the intellectual aspect is already large on the teachers in the schools. It is beyond presumptuous of parents to expect the teachers to also be the moral compasses. That is the parents\' job.
Yet the economy, for all the wonderful \'things\' we have to improve our standard of living, is pretty crappy. Most people can not get by without both parents working, which means that there is noone staying home to be with the children and teach them these most important life lessons.
Ultimately, where does responsibility lie? I don\'t have an answer to that question. We are genetically geared to do what we have to, to survive. We are educated in our society to believe that this means working hard and having \'things\'. We are not \'doing well\' unless we have these \'things\'.
I worry for our world, for our children, for us all. Things need to change, and we don\'t seem to know where to start.