Originally posted by Spacemunkie
Sheffield deserve to stay up because West Ham broke the rules and weren\'t punished. Pretty simple really.
Leeds got a shafting, why shouldn\'t West Ham?
West Ham WERE punished - by way of a five and a half million pound fine. Peanuts granted in lieu of the fact they stayed up but the commission will argue they didn\'t have to deduct points it was only an option. You can talk about precedents with Wimbledon etc but they\'ll tell you they\'ll judge each case on their merits.
As I said, I think the Premier League dug their own grave by leaving it too late to make a decision. I think West Ham should have been punished and they were. Should it have been more severe? Probably but I\'m just uncomfortable with matters like this resulting in a loss of points. Had they fielded 13 players then yes but I feel it was too cloudy an issue to hand out a penalty with such immense ramifications.
I would have felt more disposed to Sheff Utd had Mr Warnock focused more on his own team rather than blaming West Ham; Carlos Tevez; The Premier League; Alex Ferguson for fielding a weakened team against West Ham; Rafa Benitez for the same against Fulham; referees; his wife; the weather; José Mourino\'s dog etc
Try to win more games Neil instead of playing 4-5-1 and then this situation wouldn\'t have arisen.
Anyhow I\'m biased against the Blades \'cos I lost count of the number of Sheff Utd fans who \'invaded\' the Leeds forums gloating at our demise when we got relegated this time around so yes, my spectacles are probably more than a hint of rose...