apocalypse( is that how you spell it

airhead

Coffin Dodger / Keymaster
The number of the beast is 666 (six hundred sixy six or DCLXVI in the Greek) - Revelations

Some are trying to equate that with the date 06/06/06.
 

mistamick

New member
yeah but it will have happened before e.g. 06/06/1906. and it didn\'t happen to the victorians, so why us???
 

supervike

Super Moderator
Iron_Maiden-The_Number_Of_The_Beast-Front.jpg
 

dougaderly

New member
yeah, well, you\'re all gonna feel silly when your realize that everyone has been reading the number backwards and it\'s actually 66... oh, never mind. :(
 

Avelorn

Sven Jonsson
Originally posted by dougaderly
yeah, well, you\'re all gonna feel silly when your realize that everyone has been reading the number backwards and it\'s actually 66... oh, never mind. :(

lollollol
 

mistamick

New member
yeah, what do you call it when a name or word is the same when you spell it backwards, or doesn\'t that work with numbers!!!!!:eek:
 

Evil Dave

New member
Does anyone remember the Saturday Night Live, when Jim Belushi played Damien?

\"His Birthmark says 999.\"
Oh, well I guess we\'re safe.\"

On the bright side, if it is the Apocalypse, at least I won\'t have to pay back those damn student loans.
 

wiccanpony

Official Freak Bar Witch
:eek:What!! is it that time of millennium again!!
.....don’t start the Apocalypse until I find something to wear to the event. hummmmm black leather or just blood?? :rolleyes::plol
 

supervike

Super Moderator
Originally posted by Evil Dave
Does anyone remember the Saturday Night Live, when Jim Belushi played Damien?

\"His Birthmark says 999.\"
Oh, well I guess we\'re safe.\"

Thats funny! I used to do that when my kids were babies.

I\'d yell at my wife while looking at my kids head

\"Look! It says 6....6...oh thats a 5, we\'re ok...\"

She never found it amusing.
 

vincegamer

Active member
Originally posted by Evil Dave
Does anyone remember the Saturday Night Live, when Jim Belushi played Damien?
Actually, it was JOHN Belushi, Jim\'s funnier brother.

And of course in a previous post I don\'t have time to search for, I pointed out that the number was originally 616 and was mistranslated.
 

Avicenna

New member
Originally posted by vincegamer
...and was mistranslated.
Lets not go down the mistranslated bible bits route... could be here for some time :rolleyes:

I think the Apocalypse is just about to start in Japan... I wonder how quickly people will get pics of the 4 horsemen or the seven headed dragon up on the net?
 

Avicenna

New member
Nah, 2012 is going to be a massive shift in world view. What is going to cause the shift is hotly contested, but we will see. ;)
 

airhead

Coffin Dodger / Keymaster
Originally posted by vincegamerAnd of course in a previous post I don\'t have time to search for, I pointed out that the number was originally 616 and was mistranslated.
Vince, according to all the references I could find, you have that backwards. There were some later LATIN transcriptions that had 616. A short excerpt from one of the comentaries that I found - it goes on.

The number 666 is commonly regarded as an example of gematria, an ancient numbers game in which each letter of the alphabet was assigned a numerical value. Any name could be encoded in a number representing the total of the letters in the name. John makes it clear that 666 is man\'s number, or \"the number of a person\" (NRSV). The problem is that with a bit of ingenuity many prominent names in every generation can be made to add up to 666. One commentator wrote that such identifications \"lead to nothing just because they lead to everything\" (Hendriksen 1939:273). The numbers work quite well, for example, with the name Adolf Hitler.

But in order to convey any meaning at all to John\'s original readers, 666 must have pointed to a name they recognized in their own time. The most common suggestion is Nero Caesar. But as Robert Mounce has pointed out (1977:264), \"this solution asks us to calculate a Hebrew transliteration of the Greek form of a Latin name, and that with a defective spelling.\" When the Latin form of the name is transliterated directly into Hebrew, the result is 616, and sure enough, in the western Roman Empire where Latin was dominant, there were manuscripts in which the number was recorded as 616 (Irenaeus noticed this already in the late second century in his Against Heresies 5.30). Clearly, the scribes who copied the book of Revelation were familiar with gematria, and it may well have played a part in John\'s riddle. Yet because of its indeterminacy no solution based on that phenomenon alone is likely ever to be proven or to find general acceptance.

A more cautious approach starts from the simple recognition that 666 is linked to the characteristic interest in the number seven throughout the book of Revelation as a number of completeness or perfection. The number 666 falls short of the magic seven three times over--at the level of hundreds, tens and single units. William Hendriksen (1939:182) defined its message as \"failure upon failure upon failure.\" The point is subtly different from the dividing of seven in half to yield three and a half years, the equivalent of the \"42 montes\" or \"1,260 days.\" These numbers, as we have seen, represented a divine limitation on the authority of the dragon or the beast, while the number 666 attempts to characterize the beast himself. At the very least, the ancient philosophical notion of evil as a lack or a deficiency of the good seems to be at work in John\'s mysterious number of the beast.
 
Back To Top
Top