Big sword

minimaker

New member
Hi,

I was just looking at some Chinese weapons at found this:
http://site.netopia.com/bagua/weapons/view.nhtml?profile=weapons&UID=43

Hmm, looks like those Rackham Fianna swords may be correctly sized after all. lol

Bye, Ming-Hua
 
For the most part I do not have a problem with the size of Rackam\'s swords, look at the old claymore\'s, I have heard they could be 6\' tall at time\'s. What I usually have a problem with is the Fianna\'s waist line and legs. Way to Barbie for me.

As for the link thanks for showing it. I wonder what something like that would weigh? I would not want to be in a prolonged battle with something that big. Just give me a regular sized broadsword
 

tidoco2222

Active member
Nah this is a sword

Now that is what you call a sword. To be able to wield and balance like that it must be quite light weight as well.
I collect swords and the biggest in my collection is a Claymore and you would struggle to swing that around one handed.
 

Avicenna

New member
But these guys wouldnt just be using muscle strength. They would be using very traditional movements developed over thousands of years and i would imagine that it is a precise art of weilding the weapon. Not just hack\'n\'slash.

And not to mention their use of their Chi

Fu4.jpg
 

tidoco2222

Active member
@ Avicenna, I totally agree and wasn\'t trying to detract from the warriors skill in martial arts but just trying to say that the sword itself would have to have a good balnce as well.
 

Sand Rat

New member
Umm guys not trying to detract from the skill of the user, but he aint much taller than the sword is long - thats why it looks so huge.
 

slidedog

New member
Bagua is a somewhat esoteric art that is not well taught much anymore. That sword is actually fairly light and is flexible. Bagua involves a lot of spinning and requires great flexibility in the practitioner. A Master of the art would be able to do some crazy thing with that and you would probably be surprised that even though the sword is long he would be tearing you up from very close in. I\'ve studied it a bit but never moved to weapons and found that my 6\"2\" frame was not well suited to the movment required. I\'m just a big stiff!:cool:
 

Avicenna

New member
Originally posted by slidedog
Bagua is a somewhat esoteric art that is not well taught much anymore.
Aaah, but this is the case with 90% of martial arts these days, especially in the west, since the 1970s commercialised the whole scene...
 

Ritual

New member
Originally posted by Avicenna
Aaah, but this is the case with 90% of martial arts these days, especially in the west, since the 1970s commercialised the whole scene...
My girlfriend trains wushu for a chinese master whose family style of wushu has been intact for over 500 years. You can probably guess what he thinks of most martial arts these days... :D Basically all other wushu clubs in Sweden are run by people who used to train with him and then their egos got too big...
 

minimart

New member
Regardless of that man\'s size and the swords weight, he is in a static pose. There does not look to be enough of a counterbalance in the handle so there is the matter of his wrist strength. Certainly there will be the matter of movement and form but I cannot help but marvel at the strength that is required as well.
 

Avicenna

New member
Its not muscular strength that these guys train, its tendon strength. It is a strange concept to try to grasp unless you have trained it yourself, but it certainly works - iknow from experience. His power is awesome - irrespective of how \'thin\' the blade may be.

Also this is a photo, so you dont know what he was doing before or after - that pose may only have been held for a second ;)
 

Sand Rat

New member
From my experience with most Chinese swords, it would actually be rather well balanced - and yes would still require a great amount of strength and training to make it work properly.
 
Back To Top
Top