Can anyone answer me a question about a model and if its legal like this??

[Hawks58]

I would have sent this to roolzboyz but my e-mail hates me. (I have sent it 4-5 times with it not deleaveing.)

If a model has \"true grit\"(can use a bolter in Close combat as a weapon.) and if I put the bolter so its in both his hands like hes carrying it and have a Close Combat weapon on his belt and not in his hands(like the little knives that come as accerouses). Useing What You See is What you Get does this model count as haveing both a Close Combat weapon and Bolter?
Thxs

 

[Spanky]

I will be doing that with some of my nurgle troops when I do them. Its legal as far as I can see. The model won\'t always be in close combat, sometimes it has to shoot from afar. just be sure to mix them up, some with the cc weapon in its hand, some holding a bolter in both hands. Good luck

 

[precinctomega]

Yes

This is perfectly legal. WYSIWYG rules only apply to the degree that the model must have a close combat weapon modelled on it somewhere. To be fair to your opponent, this should probably be a sword or axe rather than a knife, which can sometimes be preceived as just another bit of kit.

 

[Warpfangs]

Assuming its not a character, its gonna be pretty imaterial. Chances are the models in its unit do not have the choice to NOT take a CCW.
Its hardly gonna be confusing; if one of the non-character guys ion a unit isn\'t waving around a sword, and the rest are, you can pretty safely assume he has a CCW unless something else is clearly shown (power weapon, etc).

 

[KingM]

Space wolves grey hunters have true grit right? They all have their bolters in 2 hands, so I don\'t see a problem

 

[mjungledog]

True Grit

What you propose is perfectly legal. True Grit is a skill, not a piece of equipment, so it does not need to be modelled.

Hope this helps.