Did Adam have a member?

[freakinacage]

Originally posted by mattrock



:beer:

:drunk:

 

[Godlikebuthumble]

Orginal gepostet von uberdark

Originally posted by mud duck
Uber you have to admit that it is nice to be able to have a discussion like these, and have it remain calm, respectful, and not degrading into a flame war with everyone Suxors and calling Nazi on those that disagree with their view.

very true....and thats why i like this site. its just interesitng that we are all talking about adam\'s member. next thing you know we will be asking if girth was an issue as well in biblical times. lol and thats why i love you all. *smooches*

First of all, crying \"hitler\" don\'t work... See Godwin\'s Law: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GodwinsLaw

Second: Girth seemed at least notable. I dare you all to look up Ezekiel 23:19-20. I double dare you.

 

[mattrock]

They just refer to \'horses\' and \'donkeys\' because Wookies weren\'t widely known at the time. lol

 

[wiccanpony]

are \"we\" still playing with Adam\'s member



be sure to wash you hands:cussing:lollollol

 

[freakinacage]

Originally posted by Godlikebuthumble
I dare you all to look up Ezekiel 23:19-20. I double dare you.

are you suggesting that this is appropriate for us or you?

 

[Godlikebuthumble]

Just running away with Ubie\'s \"suggestion\"

BTW, Freak, loving that signature .gif of yours lol

 

[freakinacage]

thanks but i don\'t think it\'s within reg\'s? i deleted it last night but it hasn\'t gone!! i was just trying it out to see if i could stick it in

 

[Dragonsreach]

Originally posted by freakinacage
thanks but i don\'t think it\'s within reg\'s? i deleted it last night but it hasn\'t gone!! i was just trying it out to see if i could stick it in

It\'s oversized by 34 pixcels..Lucky you. lol

It\'s ok to see once but gets irritating, like a constantly repeatingTV Advert.

 

[Infidel Castro]

Originally posted by Dragonsreach

Originally posted by reverend
Ah, banned again. This time for unnecessarily stupid behaviour. I thought I was talking sensibly.

I suppose your questions must scare their blinkered little mind sets.
I\'ve only visited the site a couple of times (following your pointers) and didn\'t want to get involved in what I see, or rather saw, as entrenched, undeviating and extremely blinkered bigotry.
However, I do admire your perseverance in attempting to raise questions among them.
How many times have you been banned now? And are you aiming at the Big Ban?

I\'ve been banned for infractions on a number of occasions DR! Still, everyone loves a fool

I\'ve been offline for a month and it\'s strange being back...

 

[Infidel Castro]

Originally posted by fieldarchy

Originally posted by reverend
Ah, banned again. This time for unnecessarily stupid behaviour. I thought I was talking sensibly.

You were banned for that question? I thought it was a good one. hmmm sounds like it\'s just a bunch of wankers running that site mate.

Been banned for suggesting that, I have! lol

 

[Avicenna]

Originally posted by mattrock
There is evidence (parituclarly as concerns mathematical probability) that the \'ooze\' to \'life\' jump is next to impossible. That\'s not to say that it didn\'t happen, but to happen by random chance and then to be followed by the relatively precise series of changes that must necessarily have followed to lead to the order of our current ecological system ...well...the odds against it are simply mind-numbing.

But don\'t forget that in an infinate universe the odds become a dead cert!

So I look at it that over evolutionary time in an nigh on infinite universe the likelyhood that the conditions were perfect on one planet out of billions is pretty high However, I also think that this doesnt rule out a touch of creative imput at some stage by a higher being

The theories aren\'t mutually exclusive - you just have to find your own balance


As for Adam having a member... he would have needed to urinate, so why not?

 

[Infidel Castro]

And to all you naughty folk, stop hijacking the willy issue! lol

 

[Talion]

Here\'s a question I\'ve always wondered.

When someone get\'s possessed by a demon, why does it take only a christian priest to exocise it? Are all ghosts/demons christians?

Can you be possessed if you\'re are muslim/hindu? If so do you need to convert before the bugger will leave you?

 

[treide]

I think that the Exorcism Agency sends over an Exorcist-in-training with all of the holy books of the major religions. He/she starts reading sections from each book, and whichever section really pisses off the demon, they then call in the licensed Exorcist from that faith. That\'s what I heard, anyway

 

[Infidel Castro]

Talion, have a look on you tube for exorcisms - i\'m sure there are Islam ones floating about on there. I just think they\'re all a bit loopy meself, but then hey, how would I know!

 

[Talion]

I see so all Christian demons possess Christians, Islamic Demons possess Muslims etc.

us Atheist are safe then.......or maybe we do, but then the demon realises he doesn\'t believe in himself then disappears.