ha!My best double take was:
The Lovely Bones, half hidden under Leonard Nimoy's Autobiography.
Now that was a serious neck twisting "WTF" moment.
actually i think that is ok. check with einion though, he's the grammar police, or amazon warrior. not sure now though...At this point in my porn-peddling career, I was a bit jaded, because all I could think was that gramatically, it should be "Mom and I".
:quiet:
i still remember one year my friends took a picture of two books laying next to each other. one on top of the other and i had to turn around to look at it when i realized what it said.
harry potter and the womanly art of breastfeeding.
definitely a WTF moment.
At this point in my porn-peddling career, I was a bit jaded, because all I could think was that gramatically, it should be "Mom and I".
:quiet:
actually i think that is ok. check with einion though, he's the grammar police, or amazon warrior. not sure now though...
At this point in my porn-peddling career, I was a bit jaded, because all I could think was that gramatically, it should be "Mom and I".:quiet:
Back on topic, Neal Stephenson's Cryptonomicon bought me a ton of crap from people who thought I was reading a book about dark magic...and the black cover with weird symbols didn't help my cause. :eyeroll:
yeah that's what i was thinking of the but the complexity that evil tend points out made me question it in the first placeI always heard that you remove the part before the "and"...if it still works, you're okay...
"Fred and I are going" = "I am going"
"The book is about Fred and me" = "The book is about me"
don't know if that's true or not, but it's def. off topic. :smile: