Infidel Castro
New member
Quietimanes wrote...
Your friends vote high and your enemies vote low, go figure.
...as part of the discussion on Beltane and the sniping issue that had a large section of our Latin brethren up in arms (feedback/gripes/gremlins section) and has got me thinking as result. Namely, I\'m thinking have I been sniped; if yes by whom; and does that mean I\'ve got enemies?
He\'s made me consider who might not like me on this site, and that\'s interesting. The kind of people I\'ve pissed off in the past are strong characters who come across as authoritative. My reason for pissing them off has been that their opinions seemed quite pompous and needed pricking (I know, that means I\'m a prick). In time though, we\'ve met in the middle ground and I now consider most of those folk to be good sparring partners at worst and damnably nice at best. It pleases me when some people realise that i do speak sense on the odd occasion and then have to back me up (albeit grudgingly in some cases).
But what about the others? The enemy behind the curtain/throne/fridge/keyboard is a shadowy figure. I don\'t want to slip into a paranoid meltdown here, but is there really a dark, secretive underworld here that operates solely to undermine the work of the less shadowy but just as annoying anti-snipers (the folk who always mark high)?
Am I speaking with these people on a daily basis? Do they wear hoods and have funny handshakes when i\'m not looking?
But enemies is a strong word. Do we have to have enemies? Maybe I\'m just being naive. Maybe I just wanted a new thread that for once didn\'t involve a java cartoon or something. I want real debate
Your friends vote high and your enemies vote low, go figure.
...as part of the discussion on Beltane and the sniping issue that had a large section of our Latin brethren up in arms (feedback/gripes/gremlins section) and has got me thinking as result. Namely, I\'m thinking have I been sniped; if yes by whom; and does that mean I\'ve got enemies?
He\'s made me consider who might not like me on this site, and that\'s interesting. The kind of people I\'ve pissed off in the past are strong characters who come across as authoritative. My reason for pissing them off has been that their opinions seemed quite pompous and needed pricking (I know, that means I\'m a prick). In time though, we\'ve met in the middle ground and I now consider most of those folk to be good sparring partners at worst and damnably nice at best. It pleases me when some people realise that i do speak sense on the odd occasion and then have to back me up (albeit grudgingly in some cases).
But what about the others? The enemy behind the curtain/throne/fridge/keyboard is a shadowy figure. I don\'t want to slip into a paranoid meltdown here, but is there really a dark, secretive underworld here that operates solely to undermine the work of the less shadowy but just as annoying anti-snipers (the folk who always mark high)?
Am I speaking with these people on a daily basis? Do they wear hoods and have funny handshakes when i\'m not looking?
But enemies is a strong word. Do we have to have enemies? Maybe I\'m just being naive. Maybe I just wanted a new thread that for once didn\'t involve a java cartoon or something. I want real debate