FHA vs. Lawyers

johnboyjjb

Active member
Some of you might have seen this.

(Everyone who has ever bought a house will enjoy this.)

A New Orleans lawyer sought an FHA loan for a client. He was told the loan would be granted if he could prove satisfactory title to the parcel of property being offered as collateral. The title to the property dated back to 1803, which took the lawyer over three months to track down.

After sending the information to the FHA, he received the followingreply. (Actual letter):

\"Upon review of your letter adjoining your client\'s loan application, we note that the request is supported by an Abstract of Title.
While we compliment the able manner in which you have prepared and presented the application, we must point out that you have only cleared title to the proposed collateral property back to the year 1803. Before final approval can be accorded, it will be necessary to clear the
title back to its origin.\"

Annoyed, the lawyer responded as follows (actual letter):

\"Your letter regarding title in Case No.189156 has been received. I note that you wish to have title extended further than the 194 years covered by the present application. I was unaware that any educated person in this country, particularly those working in the property area, would not know that Louisiana was purchased by the United States from France in 1803, the \'year of origin\' identified in our application.

For the edification of uninformed FHA bureaucrats, the title to the land prior to U.S. ownership was obtained from France, which had acquired it by \'Right of Conquest\' from Spain. This same land came into the possession of Spain by \'Right of Discovery\' made in the year 1492 by a sea captain named Christopher Columbus, who had been granted the privilege of seeking a new route to India by the Spanish monarch, Isabella. The good queen, Isabella, being a pious woman and almost as careful about titles as the FHA, took the precaution of securing the blessing of the Pope before she sold her jewels to finance Columbus\' expedition.

Now the Pope, as I\'m sure you may know, is the emissary of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. God, it is commonly accepted, created this world. Therefore, I believe it is safe to presume that God also made that part of the world commonly known as \'Louisiana\'.

God, therefore, would be the owner of origin and His origins date back to before the beginning of time, this world as we know it AND even before the FHA. I hope you find God\'s original claim to be satisfactory.

Now, may we please have our damned loan?\"
 

supervike

Super Moderator
Lawyers have a terrific sense of humor!!

You should see how they laugh when they hand you the bill!!!lollol
 
Back To Top
Top