GORBAD IRONCLAW kinda sorted post!!

T

Tommie Soule

New member
yo john
top stuff mate! i got the seperate site thingy sorted(just goes to show how long i not been around)
the brown line is a miss mould i just went with so i did it like a crack
and you are dead right about the lamp being too close.

who thinks i should do it all again?(photos that is):)
 
T

Tommie Soule

New member
the lot as i intended, soz if i ranted earlier(i\'m bitter cos I\'m a virgin still):D

vote also
http://www.coolminiornot.com/173887
 
G

generulpoleaxe

New member
Originally posted by Tommie Soule
yo john
top stuff mate! i got the seperate site thingy sorted(just goes to show how long i not been around)
the brown line is a miss mould i just went with so i did it like a crack
and you are dead right about the lamp being too close.

who thinks i should do it all again?(photos that is):)
Click to expand...

as long as the realy good shots are on the ebay auction you will be fine mate.
no need to keep reposting the pics on cmon as that annoys people.

don\'t mention brown lines mate as i just remembered that story and can\'t stop laughing lol
 
D

Darkmessiah

New member
thats up 2 u tommie boy, when iv taken pics of somethin i want to sell, i always ask myself is this the best pic i can take, if these are the best quality pics u can take then cool, but if u can take some better pics by lending stuff or somethin then, id prob do that...

it wouldnt be tommie if their wasnt any reference to brown lines...
 
Talonicus

Talonicus

New member
Great bit of painting.
Nothing spectacular just really solid stuff.
A mid 8 from more.
REf scores, they never make sense to me, this site is summed up perfectly by mr poleaxe earlier \"i wouldn\'t worry about scores tommie, i struggle to get out of the 6\'s nowdays.
if it gives people a big chubbie by giving shitty scores scores to any one other than those to whome their lips are attached in a barnacle fashion then so be it.\"

That is exactly how the scoring appears most of the time on this site..... unless you are polish. :)
Great Job.

Nigel
 
O

OrkyDave

New member
Fantastic stuff, I must get rouind to painting this one up myself!

Solid paintwork, and a 9 from me, the only thing I don\'t \'get\' though is what are the turquoise checks on the inside of the cape? They look intentional but just seem out of place IMHO.
 
P

phael_minis

Member
This mini has been sniped....
One submission is rating 6.4, the other 6.2...

Just have a look on usually minis rating between 6.0 and 6.5, there is a strong difference...

Maybe you should repost it without speeking of it in forums, it can protect you from snipers...

Cheers
 
T

Tommie Soule

New member
I\'M NOT BOTHERED ABOUT MY RATING.:cussing:

I put a lot of effort (2 evenings, which is now 3 and soon to be 4) in to producing good images for you all to enjoy, learn from and then hopefully find a good owner.
that is what i\'m bothered about. can any body help me with this, any info would be cool.

p.s I DON\'T CARE ABOUT MY RATING!!!!!
 
B

Beelzebrush

Active member
I\'m not sure why being bothered about your scores or rating etc. is seen as a negative. It is a mini rating site afterall. Scoring higher on a mini can be really satisfying... it can also vindicate the hours you spent painting the damned thing in the first place. Imagine that you\'ve been painting 6s-7s and then suddenly break into the 8s... cool! Being (genuinely) rated by your peers is a great way of progressing and improving too... there\'s nothing like a bit of competitiveness to push you forward. Incidentally that wasn\'t directed at you TS. I was just posting a generalisation.

I don\'t see anything wrong with your images TS, they are crisp, in focus and well lit.
 
B

Beelzebrush

Active member
Yeah... the images in your gallery aren\'t so good. They\'ve been compressed presumably. What is the image size that you are trying to post there?

If it is that the gallery is compressing the images, why not get rid of the close-up backshot... I don\'t think you need it, it\'s not helping the overall submission and like most large close-ups - they are rarely flattering :D You could maybe lose one of the duplicated side-shots too.

*edit - I just noticed that you are hosting them elsewhere. In which case, check your image width (if it\'s the last set you\'ve posted on page one of this thread - they are 800 pixels wide) - The gallery will shrink it if it\'s over 600 pixels wide, and it would explain the loss of quality. You\'re better off reducing them yourself to the correct size.
 
T

Tommie Soule

New member
your advice is sage beezel i\'ll get on it, also thanx for being the first to not even mention r*t*ngs AND give some help:beer::beer::beer:for you.
 
T

Tommie Soule

New member
Originally posted by Beelzebrush
and like most large close-ups - they are rarely flattering :D You could maybe lose one of the duplicated side-shots too.
Click to expand...


un-flattering but educational for those who want to learn:)
 
T

Tommie Soule

New member
it\'s most probly cos i was arsing around reposting it and all you guys had already done your bit on the old naff ones, but hey.. sh*t happens:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back To Top
Top