Not your usual ratings gripe... I don\'t think.

[Naukhel]

I\'ve just been doing a bunch of voting, and even some commenting, and I
noticed something that I, personally, am inclined to disagree with...

The worded descriptions of the rating values.
I noticed that the first step above \'tabletop quality\' is \'not bad\'.
With these in this order, the implication seems to be that \'tabletop quality\' is,
in fact... bad. Not good.

While the numbers disagree with me, I\'d actually rather see \'tabletop quality\' than
\'not bad\' on my minis.

Or maybe I\'m just weird.

\'Not bad\' to me just doesn\'t sound like a positive thing.

 

[Roger Bunting]

I never really considered that. Maybe superior tabletop quality would be beter than not bad?

 

[DaN]

I think it\'s a regional thing.

Being English, and masters of understatement

I could see a 1:1 Imperator titan painted by yellow one and still happily say \"Not bad\" lol

 

[Ebonbuddha]

Drink...:beer: