Originally posted by Einion
Well it\'s possible this is freehand... but not from the painter of the rest of the figure!
With any claim like this you want to see more work from the same person, see what their level is like consistently, but the rest of the figure is pretty good evidence here.
Einion
Originally posted by Starfall
Calm down, guys... I think it was meant to be a joke. She named the pic \"freehand\" but the title in her gallery is an emoticon (\"\"), which is a hint she isn\'t serious. It is funny (to some people...) because it\'s so obvious this is NOT freehand.
I am sorry, you are right. I took it at face value as it was presented here. Of course it is true, I read it on the internet.Originally posted by Starfall
Calm down, guys... I think it was meant to be a joke. She named the pic \"freehand\" but the title in her gallery is an emoticon (\"\"), which is a hint she isn\'t serious. It is funny (to some people...) because it\'s so obvious this is NOT freehand.
Yep, that was pointed out before I posted. Sorry what I meant to get across was one can paint this detailed, not that this could have beenOriginally posted by Ebonbuddha
Actually, just look at the hat.Its not even on the miniature.
But that would be a waste of some perfectly good beef! I say we use a stake instead lolOriginally posted by vincegamer
I say we burn her at the steak!:flame:
That\'s just sad ain\'t it?Originally posted by Sonnyslayer
She had alot of replys on the forum.. like nice freehand etc etc.. and then i said it was no way that was freehand.. she seemed to be pretty serious..