remember the guy that painted with his butt? *including interview*

Braveheart712

New member
Thank you so much Spazzy for posting your interview. I cannot say I was shocked by any answers he gave you, in contrast his words fit like the last piece of an almost completed puzzle to what I expected. No Ritual, I never studied under this person but I do know his type. Lessons can be learned from nearly ever teacher, I just believe some teachers are better than others. I do commend this person however for being candid with his answers. While I may not agree with him I do respect the fact that he gave you open and heartfelt answers. If he has found his niche and is doing well, more power to him, all I am saying is there are about a million other things I would spend my money on that a \"painting\" created with his arse and phallus.
 

lizcam

New member
There are 2 questions here as I see it.


  1. Is pee pee painting a valid art form?

    Well, I guess so. Anything can be used to lay paint on canvas. It\'s a bit silly to get upset if people laugh at what you\'ve done and a bit snobbish to take it so seriously (as in his answers in the interview). It\'s a goofy way to paint and if I did paintings with my boobies I\'d totally expect people to laugh at it. If they sold, cool, but honestly to not see the joke is a bit much.
  2. Should he have been fired for his art?

I think Ubie answers this one best. I don\'t like it but it is the public school system after all. If he wanted to stay in that job he should have gone for some sort of private school that didn\'t care or tutor students. (that could have gotten him in more trouble tho\'.
lol )


All in all for me, some of the pictures are ok but I wouldn\'t hang any in my house. Not my thing.
 

Dragonsreach

Super Moderator
Staff member
Originally posted by Roger Bunting
I\'ve got no problem with him wanting to paint with his butt and dangly bits.
Ditto
I don\'t think it\'s original or clever, or that the results are any good really.
Ditto
I\'d like to know why he does it.
Actually I don\'t care.
A lot of contemporary art is as much, sometimes more, about the idea.
Unfortunatley it\'s become a gereral perception that Art now needs an explanation, instead of explaining itself.
Hell, you can get good marks in art colleges if you can justify your idea well, even if you don\'t appear to have done much at all.
That statement applies as much to the work environment as it does to colleges and I\'m not trying to derail the discussion there.

If I remember correctly in the original thread I was for his right to be an artist and his mode of expression, but comprehended the school boards decision.
 

Shawn R. L.

New member
The way anything someone does becomes \'art\' that the term has lost all meaning.

There is a very prestigious museum in San Francisco, The De Young. Very good stuff there..........mostly. I remember one \'piece\' was about 30 jars with apple cores of apples the \'artist\' had ate................I\'ve heard of the bar being lowered far lower than that but won\'t mention it.
 

spazzy

New member
I have spent the last few days conversing with Mr Murmur through email. At this point, my view has changed. He has explained his process to me, which is quite different from the video clips I\'ve seen. A lot of his work uses translucent paints, and he works with many layers to achieve the desired colors and effects. He also has a few models that he works works with. Not all of his work is entirely using prints taken from men\'s rear ends, but he also uses prints from women\'s genitalia. (if he hadn\'t told me that is what he used, I would have never known) Again, very odd, but over the last few days I have come to respect the amount of thought and work he puts into his projects. The ones that are usually seen online are the pieces that he mass produces, and they sell well enough for him to make pieces that reflect his personal views. The items online are representations of the human condition, a term I just learned the meaning of.

I told him that I didn\'t like the work that I saw online, and I felt that the way he represented himself on his site made him look flaky. He said that everybody he has met either loves his work or hates it, and that it\'s a matter of sorting out your own feelings about it and questioning yourself. As far as coming across as flaky, he said he was going for vague, an anti ego. He wanted to separate the artist from the artwork.

Bottom line from me is this: While I don\'t like his artwork, I do appreciate it. I respect the fact that he is doing something he believes in, and is working very hard at it.
 
Back To Top
Top