Shoes for Shadowfax?

Springbok

New member
a Bit of an obscure question I know, but do you reckon it would look strange painting Gandalf\'s horse to look as if it had been shoed?
It would only be a tiny detail on the mini, but it would probably jump out at you if it wasn\'t supposed to be there.

Thanks
 

hestan101

New member
Originally posted by Springbok
a Bit of an obscure question I know, but do you reckon it would look strange painting Gandalf\'s horse to look as if it had been shoed?
It would only be a tiny detail on the mini, but it would probably jump out at you if it wasn\'t supposed to be there.

Thanks

well sort of, see as it wasnt shoed. the whole premise of shadowfax is that he is a legendary wildbeast, who works with gandalf cos he knows if he doesnt evrythingll go tits up with sauron. also the horse is white so it would really be noticeable. personaly i wouldnt, but its your mini
 

ScottRadom

Shogun of Saskatchewan
No shoes! He\'s the king of the horses (or whatever word Tolien made up for that title) and nobody puts shoes on him.
 

Amazon warrior

New member
And another vote for no shoes. Shadowfax is/was is legendarily awesome and thus completely untameable by anyone other than Gandalf, and given he likes to do things elf-style, that means no horse-shoes.
 

Monkeysplitters

New member
I dunno I vote for shoes. He was owned by the king of Rohan before he was \"loaned\" to Gandalf. So really its a toss up. Even being the king of horses his hooves wouldnt be immune to wear under burden. Theodon and Aragorn still worn armor, why wouldnt Shadowfax have shoes.

ok nerd rant over, aesthetically Id probably say no shoes, but the nerd in me thinks thats too unrealistic.
 

Amazon warrior

New member
Originally posted by Monkeysplitters
I dunno I vote for shoes. He was owned by the king of Rohan before he was \"loaned\" to Gandalf. So really its a toss up. Even being the king of horses his hooves wouldnt be immune to wear under burden. Theodon and Aragorn still worn armor, why wouldnt Shadowfax have shoes.

ok nerd rant over, aesthetically Id probably say no shoes, but the nerd in me thinks thats too unrealistic.
I have to say, The horse-nerd in me agrees with you, but I vaguely recall the books making much of the fact that while Shadowfax was the pride of Rohan, they couldn\'t actually do anything with him because they weren\'t amazing enough. So they just kicked their heels until big G came along and \"tamed\" him.
 

airhead

Coffin Dodger / Keymaster
shoes/no shoes.. Would it show? Bottom of the hooves should be a black/dark brown shadow color (unless he\'s rearing or something). Shoes should be a very dark iron/mild steel, not shiney mitheral shoes.

300_127627.jpg

Brumbyhoofrocks.jpg


istockphoto_4600689_horse_hooves_close_up.jpg
 

ScottRadom

Shogun of Saskatchewan
Yeah, they would show. The model shows the horse at a full gallop \"showing the very definition of haste\" so you can see the bottom of the hooves very clearly.

I think.

No way he had shoes though. He was a magical super horse who only let people think they owned him, or something. Like Gwaihir was to eagles. He wasn\'t one of those cool running through air on fire horses from Krull though, they were the bomb.
 

In Chigh P.I.

New member
A horse of Rohan, the chief of the Mearas. (someone did ask) Like the other mearas, Shadowfax was a grey/silver stallion and can understand the speech of Men. He was also seemingly fearless (although the shriek of a Fell Beast frightens him in the battle of Minas Tirith in the film adaptation), and can run faster than any other horse in Middle-earth. He is tamed by Gandalf and granted as a gift to him (after Gandalf had borrowed him for some time) by King Théoden of the Rohirrim. No Man could tame Shadowfax. He would not tolerate a bridle or saddle (so i guess that would include shoes) and only carried Gandalf by choice. The great horse also bore a hobbit, Pippin and the dwarf Gimli, (both times with Gandalf riding) for a short time during the War of the Ring. His name could be translated as Shadow-hair, Old English feax meaning \"hair\", and \"fax\" is an old word for a horse\'s forelock: thus the image evoked by the name is a whitened grey with a still-dark forelock. The name Shadowfax derives from the horses Skinfaxi and Hrímfaxi in Norse Mythology.

(wiki)
 

Springbok

New member
Thanks for the replies!

I\'m not clued up to the mythology, hence the question:), I was going to do something like the shoes on this horse, it looks better than just plain hooves IMO.

And here is the model I am painting.
 

Amazon warrior

New member
I don\'t think that horse is supposed to be Shadowfax. It\'s the wrong colour! Anywho, it\'s your mini at the end of the day. Would you sculpt or just paint the shoes?
 

Springbok

New member
Yea, I just like this one more that the fig with the running pose:), I was going to paint it on, but seeing as it is a possible GD entry, I just wanted make sure of the mythology.
 

Amazon warrior

New member
Having looked at both, I can see why you prefer the standing one. Why do GW suck at horses SO much? It puts me off so badly. :cry:
 

In Chigh P.I.

New member
I was going to do something like the shoes on this horse, it looks better than just plain hooves IMO.


The men of Rohan would be apalled if you did that!! lol

To be honest though, i think whatever you do would pass by most of your \'audience\' (except us LOTR fanboys of course...you\'ll be lucky to get a 5 from me if you put shoes on him!! lol)

Joking aside, im looking forward to seeing it finished, shoed or nay (lol)

btw, do GW stores still sell the LOTR range? I missed them when they were released, but now im thinking of buying some (ebay? perhaps?)

Edit: My post came out all Italics ??? Dunno why, sorry ???
 
Back To Top
Top