Originally posted by Gilvan Blight
Originally posted by Yuggoth
Why would anyone be bothered by little toy soldiers beeing historically incorrect? I respect you opinion, but I really don`t get it.
They are not meant to be shown in schools or something like that, they are for gaming or for looking cool on in your cabinet.
I would understand someone having concerns about a Hitler mini, but thats because he still has living victims and followers. Leonidas on the other hand has no political relevance at all.
There are a few reasons. First off there is no reason that a gamer can\'t learn something from the hobby. Military gamers in particuar are often also history buffs. Besides playing out battles on the table they also research those battles and learn about the relavence of the battles, the people involved, etc. By misrepresenting a historical figure you are \'teaching\' a false truth. I\'m sure many people don\'t know the history of the era, and thus assume things like this must be correct since it\'s the only frame of referance they know. Aliengod3\'s comment is a perfect example of someone who\'s knowledge of this period of history only comes from the Fiction (Note: The V on the shield is histoically accurate, so wouldn\'t be a problem).
Another note is misrepresentation of an actual person. How would you like it if someone decided to make a mini of you, but then got all the facts wrong? He was a soldier who had a uniform, why not get it right? How about if 300 years from now they released USMC minis where all the troops are topless, have ditched the fatigues and wear bonnets?
Overall I do know it\'s for a game, and most likely a fantasy game, so some exageration and \'coolness\' is nice, but at that point I would have called the mini \"Spartan King\" or \"Leader of 300\".