Lleman
New member
Edit: As the title should say, the matter is about the cards' effects resolution sequence.
I claim the tactical 'Horse' zone with Catelyn Stark whose influence (1st point especially) is listed below:
My opponent, wanting to counter my manoeuvre, plays the Field Control tactical card, using my NCU claiming the zone trigger (2nd point) correctly:
This reaction card thus renders the unit Catelyn gave a free manoeuvre to Weakened.
Now, does Catelyn's influence come into play after Field Control, allowing me to remove the Weakened token, since the Targaryen card is used as an 'interrupt', or does the influence (and its token removal effect) come first as part of Catelyn's claiming the zone, followed by the Field Control reaction effect?
My opponent and I weren't at all sure of how this would play out, all the more since the additional rules (p.21) tends to offer a straightforward action/effect resolution tool but which, in our minds, seems to be vague in regards to the current situation:
In the end, we went for a half-arsed decision none of us were entirely convinced with, namely allow the weakened token to remain on my unit.
Any input here?
I claim the tactical 'Horse' zone with Catelyn Stark whose influence (1st point especially) is listed below:
My opponent, wanting to counter my manoeuvre, plays the Field Control tactical card, using my NCU claiming the zone trigger (2nd point) correctly:
This reaction card thus renders the unit Catelyn gave a free manoeuvre to Weakened.
Now, does Catelyn's influence come into play after Field Control, allowing me to remove the Weakened token, since the Targaryen card is used as an 'interrupt', or does the influence (and its token removal effect) come first as part of Catelyn's claiming the zone, followed by the Field Control reaction effect?
My opponent and I weren't at all sure of how this would play out, all the more since the additional rules (p.21) tends to offer a straightforward action/effect resolution tool but which, in our minds, seems to be vague in regards to the current situation:
In the end, we went for a half-arsed decision none of us were entirely convinced with, namely allow the weakened token to remain on my unit.
Any input here?
Last edited: