E
E-Arkham
Guest
Helloa,
Recently there was quite a rattling little debate on the Wizards of the Coast miniature boards between using craft paints (Apple Barrel, Folk Art, etc) and more professional paints (Vallejo, Citadel, etc). Though the thread itself was erased during a boards update, it did linger long enough to stir in the back of my head.
The arguments included the inability to easily thin or blend craft paints, and the ease of being able to thin or blend the professional paints. The craft side claimed equally professional results. The other side claimed that while a poor artist blames not his tools, there was no reason to handicap one\'s self.
Added to this, I\'d recently tried out Vallejo paints. I was amazed at how much easier they were to blend than the Citadels I\'d been using, and the range and tone of colours was staggering. Having painted a few figures now using the Vallejos, I realized that the quality of the techniques weren\'t really huge leaps beyond what I was already doing; however that level of quality was easier and more efficient to achieve, which in turn resulted in more inspired work.
Yet the miniatures are still painted; any pigment applied skillfully can result in an excellent figure. The only difference is that the effort involved was lessened with the professional paints, giving the painter a freedom of expression he or she might not have if struggling with poorer quality paints. Only indirectly due to benefiting the painter does the miniature truly improve with the use of better paints.
A bit of a Zen statement bubbled to mind as a result. I believe it might be one of the hidden \"truths\" of painting which I can\'t recall hearing actually said aloud until now. Perhaps it\'s something we\'ve all known subconsciously; something unspoken but globally shared. In any case, to test its validity, I throw it out to these boards:
\"The brand of paint is not for the benefit of the miniature, but the benefit of the painter.\"
Agree or disagree?
Kep
Recently there was quite a rattling little debate on the Wizards of the Coast miniature boards between using craft paints (Apple Barrel, Folk Art, etc) and more professional paints (Vallejo, Citadel, etc). Though the thread itself was erased during a boards update, it did linger long enough to stir in the back of my head.
The arguments included the inability to easily thin or blend craft paints, and the ease of being able to thin or blend the professional paints. The craft side claimed equally professional results. The other side claimed that while a poor artist blames not his tools, there was no reason to handicap one\'s self.
Added to this, I\'d recently tried out Vallejo paints. I was amazed at how much easier they were to blend than the Citadels I\'d been using, and the range and tone of colours was staggering. Having painted a few figures now using the Vallejos, I realized that the quality of the techniques weren\'t really huge leaps beyond what I was already doing; however that level of quality was easier and more efficient to achieve, which in turn resulted in more inspired work.
Yet the miniatures are still painted; any pigment applied skillfully can result in an excellent figure. The only difference is that the effort involved was lessened with the professional paints, giving the painter a freedom of expression he or she might not have if struggling with poorer quality paints. Only indirectly due to benefiting the painter does the miniature truly improve with the use of better paints.
A bit of a Zen statement bubbled to mind as a result. I believe it might be one of the hidden \"truths\" of painting which I can\'t recall hearing actually said aloud until now. Perhaps it\'s something we\'ve all known subconsciously; something unspoken but globally shared. In any case, to test its validity, I throw it out to these boards:
\"The brand of paint is not for the benefit of the miniature, but the benefit of the painter.\"
Agree or disagree?
Kep