True Blood

Ritual

New member
If it\'s boobs I want there\'s plenty of places to get it from without having to suffer through some crappy, TV-formatted vampire soap opera (my opinion based on seeing a few minutes of one of the first episodes... :]).
 

Chrome

New member
\"\'cause thats how they make Brawndo?\"
http://www.thinkgeek.com/caffeine/drinks/9cce/

I agree with both of you guys, The vampire myth is way over-exploited and mixed up nowadays. Just like this idea about elves without beards and cat eyes... And, yes... Ritual, you can never get enough of boobies! No matter where they hail from! lol

Oh, and the TV-series name was Kindred, they used Vampire The Masquerade as inspiration and props, other than that they haven\'t got much in common. :p
(and the fact that they used RPG sourcebooks as props kinda says it all about the series. lol )
 

Einion

New member
Originally posted by Ritual
Originally posted by Einion
And you can really go into detail on some of these. Like is it necessary for the wielder to have faith for a cross/crucifix to work? If crosses work it is because the vamp was a Christian in life, or is it that the Christian God in the God and his symbols repel evil? And if that\'s so then why isn\'t the Middle East overrun with vamps, given the Jews and Moslems are SOOL!
Obviously, one shouldn\'t over-analyse the vampire myth! lol
Nah, that\'s when it starts getting really fun :D
Originally posted by Ritual
What I think, though, is that vampires should have more in common with the original vampire myth than just the blood sucking... If not, why call it vampire? Other than to cash in on the huge interest of vampires.
Which original vampire myth though? If you read about Stoker\'s research in the British Library he picked and chose at will from amongst the legends in the source material - vampir, strigoi, upir/upior.

Even just in Central/Eastern Europe their supposed abilities and weaknesses varied from region to region, as well as beliefs in what created them. And that\'s not even counting the similar creatures from other continents, including the Asian and Indian versions.

Just in case it\'s of any interest to people here\'s how you\'re supposed to kill a vampire according to one source, if you want to be really sure:
attack during daylight (unless you\'re suicidal);
stake the heart (with hawthorn);
stuff mouth with garlic and sew shut;
sever the head and place it face-down in the coffin;
weight the coffin with rocks and dispose of in flowing water.

Einion
 

Ritual

New member
Originally posted by Einion
Which original vampire myth though? If you read about Stoker\'s research in the British Library he picked and chose at will from amongst the legends in the source material - vampir, strigoi, upir/upior.

Even just in Central/Eastern Europe their supposed abilities and weaknesses varied from region to region, as well as beliefs in what created them. And that\'s not even counting the similar creatures from other continents, including the Asian and Indian versions.
Well, if we\'re calling them \'vamires\' it seems logical to base them at least loosely on the central/eastern European myth, from where the name comes from (in its present form, the original source seems unknown).

I don\'t mean that all vampires in modern culture should be exactly as they were in some folkloric myth hundreds and hundreds of years ago, but they should have some profound qualities in common. I don\'t see much of those qualities in the films/series etc. I mentioned above. Vampires are too often depicted as too similar to people in their behaviour. If you remove the blood-sucking (and the occasional super-power) there would be no big difference. A vampire, to me, should above all have a sense of \"otherness\" to it. And in my eyes, they\'re solitary creatures... like spiders. Yes, Dracula had his female spawn, but he still appears as a very solitary person.
 

Avelorn

Sven Jonsson
In true blood there is solitary vampires and then there are nesting vampires that group together and often become brutalized.

I think I will continue to watch it. Despite some bad acting and script-work it has... something.
 

EArkham

Necromancer
I don\'t think she\'s ever going to play Rogue again after this series. Which might be a good thing. lol

Vampires? All explained here: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/VampireTropes

Kep
 

hestan101

New member
havent watched the show, and i personally dont intend to. im perfectly happy with peep show.

as for how a vampire should be represented, i personlly feel attratced to the ideal of the normal human, who is aware of their condition, but after transformation is an otherworldy brutal beast without a shred of humanity
 

alextheartist

New member
Let me just remind you guys.... Twilight...

twiligh10.jpg
 

darklord

New member
love true blood its great - the theme tune got me hooked - it reminds me of a tarantino type film and it looks great in HD!
 

ipaintminis

Active member
Becca\'s Rant Against Cute

I\'m so sick of all this vampire this, vampire that. glamorized vampire nonsense.

Twilight was the most ridiculous movie I\'ve seen in a very long time. Sparkley greasy brooding man/boy is the epitome of sexy?! Hell to the No. honestly I felt like I was watching a B movie, not something that makes millions of tween girls scream in ecstasy.

[rant] tell me someone else started yelling at the TV/theater when the final fight was IN A ROOM FULL OF MIRRORS and everyone COULD SEE everyone else. pissed me off so bad. [/rant]

I\'m looking forward to the next two movies ever so much :rolleyes:

But that experience alone has made me not want to touch any other recent vampire shenanigans...vis a vis True Blood.
 

Einion

New member
Originally posted by uberdark
alex: who\'s the chick vampire on the right?
Megan Franich.

Just so\'s you know, she doesn\'t actually look like that - I think they used digital post-processing on the eyes of a few of the actors in 30 Days Of Night to make them look more creepy.

Einion
 
Back To Top
Top