Originally posted by Gilvan Blight
Cool, I hope it can be replicated. If it is it would be a great example of that whole Scietific vs Religious thread from a few weeks back.
Originally posted by philologus
Originally posted by Gilvan Blight
Cool, I hope it can be replicated. If it is it would be a great example of that whole Scietific vs Religious thread from a few weeks back.
How? I don\'t recall any religion\'s book that says \"Light shalt not travel at X\" As a \"religious\" person I don\'t care how fast it goes. The article is neat, but doesn\'t refute any religious doctrine.
Originally posted by Avelorn
@Lloyd: Speedlimits?
Originally posted by philologus
Originally posted by Gilvan Blight
Cool, I hope it can be replicated. If it is it would be a great example of that whole Scietific vs Religious thread from a few weeks back.
How? I don\'t recall any religious book that says \"Light shalt not travel at X\" As a religious person I don\'t care how fast it goes. The article is neat, but doesn\'t refute any religious doctrine.
Originally posted by Shawn R. L.
All this discussion is fine but the question is - will GW still suck?