Ok, so I\'ve of course been looking through all the CCV entries, and been poking around on some other mini sites as well, and I\'ve actually been a touch underwhelmed. CCV does have a ton of good minis, but only a small handfull of great ones, which is what I\'ve seen on other sites as well. Compaired to what we\'ve seen posted on cmon just in this last week from forum goers (example anders, donga, joshua, shawn, tidoco to start) I personally see a big difference.
So this got me thinking why?! At first I thought perhaps it was our supportive environment, but ruled that out, as many other forums have a similar chemistry. I think it must be the inherent built in competitive nature of this site (with all the good and bad - sniping included). Here\'s my thinking:
When you have a forum where minis are not ranked and you go off nothing but feedback, the goal in your miniatures is to not have glaring errors, not have something to inspire negative feedback. Which seems to develop basic skills, but doesn\'t seem to inspire risk taking, or pushing ones self, and doesn\'t help to develop that sense of what creates the wow factor.
When you have a situation where there is a numerical ranking, average, \"safe\" miniatures won\'t ever get you anywhere, all the nice feedback in the world won\'t make you happy with another 6 score if you set your sights on higher. To improve you can\'t stay safe, and instead of focusing on avoiding negative feedback, the focus is in creating that wow factor in possitive feedback. And that means pushing yourself and trying new \"dangerous\" things.
In CCV I\'ve noticed some entries from cmoners and imo are a few of those that that do have that wow factor for me in the competition.
So the question is...am I making any sense here? Is this something real or is it simply that I\'ve noticed minis from friends and due to that, subconciously see them as better just from my personal attachment to the artist?
That was my rambling thought for the day
-Eric
So this got me thinking why?! At first I thought perhaps it was our supportive environment, but ruled that out, as many other forums have a similar chemistry. I think it must be the inherent built in competitive nature of this site (with all the good and bad - sniping included). Here\'s my thinking:
When you have a forum where minis are not ranked and you go off nothing but feedback, the goal in your miniatures is to not have glaring errors, not have something to inspire negative feedback. Which seems to develop basic skills, but doesn\'t seem to inspire risk taking, or pushing ones self, and doesn\'t help to develop that sense of what creates the wow factor.
When you have a situation where there is a numerical ranking, average, \"safe\" miniatures won\'t ever get you anywhere, all the nice feedback in the world won\'t make you happy with another 6 score if you set your sights on higher. To improve you can\'t stay safe, and instead of focusing on avoiding negative feedback, the focus is in creating that wow factor in possitive feedback. And that means pushing yourself and trying new \"dangerous\" things.
In CCV I\'ve noticed some entries from cmoners and imo are a few of those that that do have that wow factor for me in the competition.
So the question is...am I making any sense here? Is this something real or is it simply that I\'ve noticed minis from friends and due to that, subconciously see them as better just from my personal attachment to the artist?
That was my rambling thought for the day
-Eric