Originally posted by Dragonsreach
As someone who plays GW games, buys their products (for close to 20 years) and occasionally freelances for them I most seriously do not dislike their products. BUT I am, like a number of people here, not blinkered to the existance of other games, miniature manufacturers or am oblivious to any other form of paint or painting, which is what is generally defining a FANBOY.
What a great many of the forum denizens here do find annoying is this blinkered GW is GOD attitude which GW fanboys exude.
sorry blue inline replies don\'t work well for my eyes on this \"white\" background, maybe if they were bolded as well as blue...
but anyway. i likewise feel that GW is the devil with their pricing and poor releases of rules. but i like them. i like the look of some of their minis, and the game. i understand the \"sheep\" that follow them with the wool pulled over their eyes and can\'t see to paint beyond GW or beyond the fluff, but fanboy is a deragative(sp) term and can be done without. like Grognard etc when referring to D&D.
and no need in a spam/pointless post made jsut to insult a large group of people or a single person that has no value to the topic at hand. i didn\'t even know if i speleld dakka dakka correctly it has been years since i played or bothered looking up info on 40k.
but call me a \"fanboy\" if you want because i prefer GW paints because i have 3 sets of the last produced screw tops.
so while some attitudes may see insulting as joking, i do not. i see it as blatant attack on someone you know nothing about and don\'t know if they care for that garbage.
not all people are beer-swilling rednecks that sit around punching each other in the face because they are bored. and i use a friends description there as that is what he calls himself...
@generulpoleaxe:
also there are Revell and all those that make model cars and such, but not always will those people get into mini painting such as Reaper, GW, etc of the \"little people\" as my grandmother calls them.
but you likewise will admit that likeing a game doesn\'t make you solely confined to painting for that games products if you like painting right? for example one friend i play 40k with hates to paint and therefore only paints 40k minis because they need to be. but playing DDM and Mage Knight because he liked the games and didn\'t have to paint them.
it really depends on the backgroudn and interest of the person be it \"GW fanboy\" or othe as to why they paint. looking down on them because they only want to paint one thing doesn\'t further the community of hobby painters. and with more hobby stores closing in my area i personally would like to see things adgvacne hobby painting rather than reduce its existance to nothing.
but this is all off-topic.
@Avelorn:
as with D&D now it could be that there are some anti-GW people without the fanbase because they don\'t like the direction changes are being made. change just for the sake of change is pointless. if you are bored with one activity then try another. maybe you will come back to the previous, maybe not. no reason to discount the opinons of those who still enjoy it or try to change it just for a few people that don\'t like it.
that is what the non-tournament environment is for. make up your own rules and have fun. they are all games.
something a few 2nd AD&D players i know tried to tell people but couldn\'t prevent the lemmings from following WotC.
yes i used sheep and lemmings. they are a bit deragatory, but i feel these extremists can be equated to the actual context of the animals where in \"fanboy\" is too braod and may not properly identify who it is you are talking about. the average gamer of a specified product, or those extremists. and i prefer not to generalize all players of one game, or participant of one hobby to just a vague definition.
that would be too like classifying my with Da Vinci because with both paint. and heaven knows i an nowhere near any levels of his in brush control alone! lol