Torn blue sky
New member
Sometimes we get visitors.
Sometimes we get visitors.
Sense!Yes, this is the type of pedantics we like to see!
However, I'd contend that the it's the SUBJECT, not the range of sizes that subject belongs to that should make the scale.
So, even if a particular human could be 50% of an average sized one....it doesn't matter as it's an individual being represented. So, lets say we are sculpting bill who stands a nice even 6 ft tall.
If a sculptor 'scales him down' 50% to a stubby 3 feet tall, that is a MINATURE Bill. Surely we know that there are 3 ft tall humans, but that is not what is represented with a 3 foot Bill.
Thus we have a miniature Bill.
Anything less than a 1:1 of the subject of the sculpt = a mini (IMHO)
No, that's a model. A miniature is by definition smaller than the prototype, unless it's okay to devalue the term entirely by extending its application to where it doesn't any longer make sense... and we don't want to do that, do we?A friend I just showed this thread to made a point I'm willing to consider, even though it isn't a miniature of the subject I still think I'd call an up-scaled model of a small creature a miniature to some degree...