No Such Agency
New member
In real life... they DON\'T work. In real life, any actual breast larger than an A cup would flop out the bottom of such a garment the minute the wearer moved. They show up in fantasy fashion because they are unusual-looking - the appeal of an unusual form of semi-nudity cannot be denied. Apparently the technical term for it is \"neathage\", and an exposed underside of the breast was strictly banned by the original Comics Code, though upper cleavage was not. As someone said \"perhaps they believed moss grew there\"...Originally posted by tzor
What occasionally gets me is the really odd stuff, for example something I call an \"anti bra.\" A covering over the top of the breast leaving the bottom exposed. I don\'t even want to know how those things work. Suction cups? Glue?
As for the general sex bias in fantasy... it\'s easy to say \"OMG that\'s all sexist and wrong\". And in many ways that is true. But I view the whole \"chainmail bikini\" thing as being largely humorous at this point - yes it originated as a purely titillatory objectification of women and for that reason I tend to prefer less cheesecake-y heroines (Buffy and Willow, while attractive, never fight less than fully-clothed). But like the half-naked \"He-Man\" style male barbarian, it is a fantasy cliche and I think it has its place in the genre.