DannyBoy2k
New member
In order to not clutter up the 'real' post, I'm adding a separate poll. I've gotten a couple three answers, in and out of the forum, but I've had a few thoughts, and this and that. So. This poll is to decide how I will build my 40k P1500 Monster. The choices are:
1. Open-topped, as the illustration in the Monster-thread. The advantage is that I can make little dioramas, the disadvantage is it'd be more work.
2. Boxed-in/closed, as the Armageddon-pattern Basilisk, or modern self-propelled guns. Pro, less work. Con, probably more boring.
3. A mix of the two. A turret-like structure holding the the breach of the gun, rest open. Best of two world, potentially, but possibly, it'd look really weird.
4. Not that I think I'll do this, but I'll add a fourth choice of a fully open, or multi-part, piece, in order to see the 'inner workings' of the monster, such as engine rooms and the like. Could look VERY cool, but could also become too cluttered, and also, to look cool, I have to REALLY succeed. And it'd be INSANE amounts of work.
1. Open-topped, as the illustration in the Monster-thread. The advantage is that I can make little dioramas, the disadvantage is it'd be more work.
2. Boxed-in/closed, as the Armageddon-pattern Basilisk, or modern self-propelled guns. Pro, less work. Con, probably more boring.
3. A mix of the two. A turret-like structure holding the the breach of the gun, rest open. Best of two world, potentially, but possibly, it'd look really weird.
4. Not that I think I'll do this, but I'll add a fourth choice of a fully open, or multi-part, piece, in order to see the 'inner workings' of the monster, such as engine rooms and the like. Could look VERY cool, but could also become too cluttered, and also, to look cool, I have to REALLY succeed. And it'd be INSANE amounts of work.