Torn blue sky
New member
In addition, I don't really agree with ANY nudity in miniatures, let alone pictures of them. Most of the time (which this dio may diverge from), these minis are sophmorish, immature, and glorified. It doesn't need to be made, so why? I include GW Daemonettes here for 2 reasons: 1. I just don't think these minis are in good taste and 2. They are the objectification of women (ever seen a naked male figure from GW?)
RE: point 2, yes. Any garden variety barbarian figure you'll find as a standard pretty much anywhere, a nekid man wearing nothing more than a rag to cover his modesty. Maybe the standard has made it less objectionable, much in the same way much fewer people seem to object to semi naked females in any given genre these days. You could , however, reasonably argue that the afore mentioned barbarianesque models are quite objectifying toward men.
I respect your viewpoint of course, one mans meat is anothers poison and all that. Just food for thought.
Speakign of which, those burgers are overdue...