Edmund Dumond

Jabberwocky

New member
Here is my latest effort. I painted him as a bit of a \"dandy\", all swagger but no substance. It was my first (feeble) attempt at freehand on the tabard. The angle of the photo doesn\'t display the base well, which is a cobblestone street made from greenstuff. As always, comments and critiques greatly appreciated.

Jabber
EdmundDumond.jpg


Here is the link should you want to vote. :innocent:
 

supervike

Super Moderator
he definately is a \'dandy\'...lol

The yellow tights came out very well, and the leather on the scabbard and gloves looks good too.

The green seems a bit drab though... Maybe a bit more highlighting on that would help it pop out a bit.

The freehand is a very good start, but lacks definition.

The face is very nice...He has a very arrogant, pompous look to him...
 

Infidel Castro

New member
There\'s an interesting style fighting to get out on this piece. Do you inkwash and then mix paints back into the ink to build up a smooth set of layers? The reason i wask is that it reminds me of some of my painting somehow. Different colours to me, but similar handling of the paint. Got me interested now!
 

Jabberwocky

New member
Rev--

This particular mini was my first use of the (relatively) new reaper master series triads. The greens are from the olive triad. I like the paints, but as SV alluded to, they don\'t have quite enough range. Perhaps a pentad instead of a triad :). In the future, I will probably as a color on either side of the triad to deepen the shadows and raise the highlights.

As for the rest of the mini, it was done mostly with vallejo model colors. I have some GW inks, but I have not used them much and on this guy the only thing I shaded with ink was the metal on the scabbard. That was based with silver, shaded with blue ink, recovered with silver, then highlighted with a silver/white mix. My techniques is pretty standard stuff. Basecoat, then selectively wash with a darker color, return with the base color, then highlight with the lighter shade. At this point, I have not been doing much as far as defined layers. For example, the yellow tights were basecoated with deep yellow, then shaded with a 1:1 mix of deep yellow and flat earth, then highlighted with a 1:1 mix of deep yellow and white. I was trying to get an area on the leg that well covered in whatever color I was using at the time, then tried to smooth the transitions with the next lighter shade via thin washes. I have not been making new mixes (i.e. specifically a 1:1 mix, then 2:1 mix, then 3:1 mix, etc.) with each shade. Occasionally at the end, I will wash the entire area with a greatly thinned basecoat color. Am I making sense and have I answered your question?
 

Infidel Castro

New member
No, that\'s cool :)

Cheers for having the time to update me. I\'m going to have to piant and show you what I mean. I\'ve got two styles, one just paint built up and another with an ink wash after the first later, then building up from there with the paints in the ink to keep it fluid. When it works well it looks alright - for example:

http://www.coolminiornot.com/26154

http://www.coolminiornot.com/26155

http://www.coolminiornot.com/21829

http://www.coolminiornot.com/16000

Maybe I\'m barking up the wrong tree. Some of the pieces are a bit ropey, but it\'s a style I haven\'t used in a little while and may get back to it if I paint any time soon lol
 

Jabberwocky

New member
I think I understand...

Were you using inks as a dilutent on those minis? I have only been using inks as a selective wash. I have not been mixing them with inks. I think sometimes the inks leave a bit a gloss to the mini. I did use future floor wax on some portions of the mini, perhaps that little bit of shine is what reminded you of your work?
 

Infidel Castro

New member
I think that might be it. I did use some Futur back then. But yes, I was also using ink as a dilutant insofar as I worked back up from the ink. Wasn\'t too glossy by the end as I was working paint into it. Cheers again! :)
 
Back To Top
Top