Firearms & co... hate or love them?

[dauber22]

Originally posted by vincegamer
Heck, some people are saying Romney doesn\'t stand a chance because he is Mormon.

No, no, VInce. I believe you mis-heard. He doesn\'t stand a chance because he\'s a MORON. Moron, Vince. Not Mormon. lollollol

 

[Evil Dave]

Originally posted by vincegamer

Originally posted by funnymouthi just said it was funny. compared to racial, sexual, and economic bigotry the \"hardships\" that gun owners have to tolerate at the hand of \"bigots\" is laughable, to the point where it is disrespectful to victims of hate.

Or religious bigotry. No gun-owner is going to be considered unsuited for public office because he owns guns, but try to get an atheist elected. Heck, some people are saying Romney doesn\'t stand a chance because he is Mormon.

They said that about JFK, because he was Catholic, too.

 

[M. D. Van Norman]

Originally posted by funnymouth
i just said it was funny. compared to racial, sexual, and economic bigotry the \"hardships\" that gun owners have to tolerate at the hand of \"bigots\" is laughable, to the point where it is disrespectful to victims of hate.

Yes, I always laugh when I think about the people trying so earnestly to make me into a criminal by the stroke of a legislative pen. I\'m sure the homosexuals laugh, too, every time someone suggests that they are a threat to their community\'s children.

I guess a little bigotry is okay, so long as you can\'t prove that you\'ve been harmed by it.

 

[ZaPhOd]

Bah. Guns are so passe.

 

[funnymouth]

Originally posted by M. D. Van Norman
I guess a little bigotry is okay, so long as you can\'t prove that you\'ve been harmed by it.

hasn\'t that always been the case?
at least it is in practice.

bigotry of all kinds is bad. duh. im not promoting bigotry. like i said, i support the second amendment (and all the rest lol). however, many people have (legitimate, non-hateful) personal grievences about gun ownership, and i also support their right to persue legal action to restrict weapons. i wont vouch for either side ( though, a grenade launcher? really? i dont particullarly like the idea of that, to be honest).

its possible to have a dispute in which neither side (or perhaps both sides) are villanous. they fight to restrict, you fight to liberate, yin and yang.

 

[frenchkid]

might as well bring that one up, It\'ll spare people runing a perfectly good thread, and maybe they\'ll realise that they are repeating themself

 

[Rigged4Mini]

What was the point of bumping up this thread?

As much as I dont care about reading 21 pages worth of opinions on the matter...

Look out! The Germans are coming! HA HA

 

[NerdyOgre254]

Guns are okay, but it\'s all about the way people use them.

 

[No Such Agency]

I think we should arm gays, paraplegics and the homeless at public expense. Discuss.

 

[Torn blue sky]

I agree!
Not because I have any perticular view on the matter, but just because we CAN!

\"A gun in every hand and a cap in every ass\" lol

 

[dauber22]

Originally posted by No Such Agency
I think we should arm gays, paraplegics and the homeless at public expense. Discuss.

Well, I\'m all for arming (or legging) paraplegics. Don\'t know about the other two groups, though.

 

[krom1415]

lol lol lol
I think all firearms persons should be shot, but I havent work out by whom ???
and mines a 347 magnum :bouncy: I wish