If the same group people enter every competition and win every time. Is it fun then? There is a bit of nonsense going on in this thread that anyone can win a competition over \"all the best\" just if they work hard enough. Well.. they can\'t from many reasons, time and talent are two. It\'s as simple as that and people might not feel like they get the appreciation for their improvment. Is that a problem or are they just whining? I don\'t think they are whining just because they are sour loosers I understand their viewpoint. It can be a problem imo and calling people just to \"grow up\" is not a solution to anything (it can be pretty arrogant actually). It\'s about how you view a competition as well.. should it be fun or should it be some people strutting around and basking in the glory of winning yet another competition against the \"lesser kind\". :innocent:
This is reflected both in local and large competition. Will people even be bothered to enter against \"the best\" if they stand no chance of winning? Or from the other perspective will people who always win be bothered to enter again? It\'s about challenges. You don\'t climb Mountain Everest when you\'ve just started climbing and you won\'t climb a stair for just the challenge of it. There are many ways of solving this problem, in our lgs we used one open category that those of us considered \"the best\" entered out of good spirit. In large competitions you can either use the open system or try to have different categories. So what if people whine about \"devalued\"? It\'s like that in the GD\'s as well.. \"Well the blabla category was really bad quality so the gold you took was.. well not really a gold\" There will always be discussions like that and they are as silly every time.
There is no perfect way of solving this with one set of rules. The only possible answer in the end imo is therefor a myriad of competitions imo so you can choose in a better way what to enter. I like the open system of judging but I also think it would be boring if every major compo was judged that way. For a competitive mind a top 3 award placement can be a strong motivator.
When it comes to the pro\'s \"issue\" it often boils down to this: The history of our hobby and those competitions. People painting minis in basements for their D&D games or warhammer in their spare time vs. people making a living from it painting day and night . Is it the same thing? People might have the same feeling that some have for soccer (or proper football

) \"They aren\'t in the spirit of the hobby/sport etc.\". \"back in the days... people entered their lord from their army into the GD\'s and won nowadays it\'s all professionals and it\'s about NMM and freehands and esp. large bases\". Not a true statement but you get the drift.