PegaZus
Stealth Freak
I originally put up the profit numbers just to show that GW was doing better if you looked at the bottom line. Quick glance was that they were doing well. I couldn\'t find any real good information past what I could pull from their website. And if they were making 10 times that much ten years ago, then yeah, looks like they\'re on the wrong track.
I recall a book I read that talked about innovation and company deaths that happened to those who ignored the lower end markets. I\'ve searched repeatedly for it a couple of times, but haven\'t never come across it again. (Anybody got the name off hand? Bueller? Bueller?) It had numerous examples of a hard drive company that would abandon the lower end of the market (where it was less profitable) to these new upstart hard drive makers.
Which was where the innovations happened, which ate into the market share of the companies above them, which slowly but surely killed off the older company. Since gaming isn\'t nearly the fast paced world of computer products, what we may be seeing here is that same thing in slow motion. GW starts cutting the older, less profitable areas and focuses upon the higher end items. This is leaving room for someone to come in and start taking away market share (Hordes maybe?).
They may also be killing themselves trying for \"planned obsolescence\" with revisions to codices and such that kill off older products (an interesting article is here). The key point to me from that article was that a $90 text book that lasts longer but is resold for $60 is a better economic path than trying to sell 3 $30 books that can\'t be resold. They\'ve got one set of production costs so making one book costs less than making three books.
So, to bring it back on topic, if these new models will be useful for several subsequent owners, they\'ll be worth the increase in price. Maybe even just surviving new rule releases would make the case for the increased price. But, if the new codex comes out in a few years that makes these models worthless (assuming that they\'ve been glued and painted and thus cannot be reworked), then they\'ll a bad deal.
Overall, hell if I know. Time for a drink. :beer:
EDIT: Wouldn\'t you know it? Just as soon as I post, I find the damn book. Probably because it wasn\'t as old as I thought: The Innovator\'s Dilemma, by Clayton M. Christensen. I remember it being a good read, so figured I\'d edit and add it.
I recall a book I read that talked about innovation and company deaths that happened to those who ignored the lower end markets. I\'ve searched repeatedly for it a couple of times, but haven\'t never come across it again. (Anybody got the name off hand? Bueller? Bueller?) It had numerous examples of a hard drive company that would abandon the lower end of the market (where it was less profitable) to these new upstart hard drive makers.
Which was where the innovations happened, which ate into the market share of the companies above them, which slowly but surely killed off the older company. Since gaming isn\'t nearly the fast paced world of computer products, what we may be seeing here is that same thing in slow motion. GW starts cutting the older, less profitable areas and focuses upon the higher end items. This is leaving room for someone to come in and start taking away market share (Hordes maybe?).
They may also be killing themselves trying for \"planned obsolescence\" with revisions to codices and such that kill off older products (an interesting article is here). The key point to me from that article was that a $90 text book that lasts longer but is resold for $60 is a better economic path than trying to sell 3 $30 books that can\'t be resold. They\'ve got one set of production costs so making one book costs less than making three books.
So, to bring it back on topic, if these new models will be useful for several subsequent owners, they\'ll be worth the increase in price. Maybe even just surviving new rule releases would make the case for the increased price. But, if the new codex comes out in a few years that makes these models worthless (assuming that they\'ve been glued and painted and thus cannot be reworked), then they\'ll a bad deal.
Overall, hell if I know. Time for a drink. :beer:
EDIT: Wouldn\'t you know it? Just as soon as I post, I find the damn book. Probably because it wasn\'t as old as I thought: The Innovator\'s Dilemma, by Clayton M. Christensen. I remember it being a good read, so figured I\'d edit and add it.