Originally posted by EricJ
In the Israeli/Palastinian situation it\'s pretty much you have to say either they\'re both right, or both wrong, as basically their rational for actions are pretty much the same, wether it be defending their homeland, protecting their safety and security, retaliation, etc...the list goes on. However since 1967 Israel has become an obvious military and economic powerhouse in the region and largely the results on the land has dictated that might makes right. How this will ever end is really anyones guess.
However the situation between the Hezbollah and northern Israel is far different because basically the situation is between Syria and Israel. Syrian Leader Assad is in NO way a friend to the palastinians, and in fact has been SO cruel to them that it makes Israel look good. Rather it seems more to be a power play to assure his continued power, and essentually giving his people someone to hate, so they don\'t have time to realize that they really should be hating him.
It is an old saying, that to control a people you MUST give them something to hate and something to love, which we can see being used extensively throughout middle eastern dictatorships/Theocracies, as well as most notably historically in Facist Germany. (And presently the US?)
Bottom line is that there nothing I can think of to defend Syria\'s role, and I have to say that it is as much the fault of Syria as Israel for the desctruction of Lebenon.
I would have loved to see Lebenon 50 years ago, it sounds like it was a beautiful place.
I think most other Arab nations want to prevent a full-scale war in their region and I think they are afraid of the effects on the global economy, which would strike hard at their own economies. Especially seeing as their only commodity worth mentioning is oil.Originally posted by Evil Dave
What\'s really interesting is that the Saudi\'s and other Arab nations are not foaming at the mouth over Israels attacks, even condemning Hezbollah, much to Hezbollah\'s surprise.
Could it be the rest of the Arab nations are just as tired of Hezbollah as Israel is?
Could it be they are hoping Israel takes down the Iran\'s madman president before Iran aquires nukes?
Ah, but you don\'t think they see that Syria and Iran are the key players in preventing peace?Originally posted by Ritual
I think most other Arab nations want to prevent a full-scale war in their region and I think they are afraid of the effects on the global economy, which would strike hard at their own economies. Especially seeing as their only commodity worth mentioning is oil.Originally posted by Evil Dave
What\'s really interesting is that the Saudi\'s and other Arab nations are not foaming at the mouth over Israels attacks, even condemning Hezbollah, much to Hezbollah\'s surprise.
Could it be the rest of the Arab nations are just as tired of Hezbollah as Israel is?
Could it be they are hoping Israel takes down the Iran\'s madman president before Iran aquires nukes?
Originally posted by Swordwind
One of the soldiers that were captured is the same age as me. Kinda brings it home.
An Israeli General on the news said they\'ll pull out as soon as the soldiers are released and that if they arent they can do a hell of a lot more damage than they have been doing. The thing is those soldiers are probably dead by now anyway.
And the media is throwing up a storm about WW3 because of one of Nostradamus\' predictions saying that it would start in the middle east and would happen at the start of the 21st century. Theres a bunch of stuff in the bible too apparently.
Of course, thus making \"releasing them\' impossible. It\'s the old trick of demanding peace conditions that cannot be fulfilled, thus \"justifying\" further destruction.Originally posted by Swordwind
An Israeli General on the news said they\'ll pull out as soon as the soldiers are released and that if they arent they can do a hell of a lot more damage than they have been doing. The thing is those soldiers are probably dead by now anyway.
I can\'t say it better myself.Originally seen on Slashdot:
\"For ****\'s sake. It\'s pretty much just agreed the world over that science will be constantly used to create new and horrible weapons that could kill increasingly large numbers of people in increasingly horrible ways, but that strangely enough it\'s expected will never be used. You tell someone about Russia restarting its nuclear weapons research program and people just shrug and go, meh, they do that.
But if it turns out science might be at some point to do something that, rather than being horrific and violent, is merely strange, people freak the **** out. A bomb that can kill billions in a single moment is shrugged off as normal. But tell someone that someone might be growing sheep with human livers, and what\'s the response? Oh no! What a horrible perversion of nature! Why do we continue to let such horrible things happen! Never mind that this, you know, has the capacity to save lives or create useful technology on a huge scale. It\'s \"unnatural!\" Of course, so is fire and clothing and the internet. But for some reason those are okay and genetic engineering is not.\"
Originally posted by No Such Agency
Re stem cells:
I can\'t say it better myself.Originally seen on Slashdot:
\"For fuck\'s sake. It\'s pretty much just agreed the world over that science will be constantly used to create new and horrible weapons that could kill increasingly large numbers of people in increasingly horrible ways, but that strangely enough it\'s expected will never be used. You tell someone about Russia restarting its nuclear weapons research program and people just shrug and go, meh, they do that.
But if it turns out science might be at some point to do something that, rather than being horrific and violent, is merely strange, people freak the fuck out. A bomb that can kill billions in a single moment is shrugged off as normal. But tell someone that someone might be growing sheep with human livers, and what\'s the response? Oh no! What a horrible perversion of nature! Why do we continue to let such horrible things happen! Never mind that this, you know, has the capacity to save lives or create useful technology on a huge scale. It\'s \"unnatural!\" Of course, so is fire and clothing and the internet. But for some reason those are okay and genetic engineering is not.\"
Originally posted by Swordwind
Originally posted by No Such Agency
Re stem cells:
I can\'t say it better myself.Originally seen on Slashdot:
\"For fuck\'s sake. It\'s pretty much just agreed the world over that science will be constantly used to create new and horrible weapons that could kill increasingly large numbers of people in increasingly horrible ways, but that strangely enough it\'s expected will never be used. You tell someone about Russia restarting its nuclear weapons research program and people just shrug and go, meh, they do that.
But if it turns out science might be at some point to do something that, rather than being horrific and violent, is merely strange, people freak the fuck out. A bomb that can kill billions in a single moment is shrugged off as normal. But tell someone that someone might be growing sheep with human livers, and what\'s the response? Oh no! What a horrible perversion of nature! Why do we continue to let such horrible things happen! Never mind that this, you know, has the capacity to save lives or create useful technology on a huge scale. It\'s \"unnatural!\" Of course, so is fire and clothing and the internet. But for some reason those are okay and genetic engineering is not.\"
Seconded
Originally posted by Evil Dave
As for Government funding:
If the scientists are willing to do the work without their six figure salaries and the high wastage of funds they\'re used to, they can do it.
I work in the science field and have seen how a lot of these guys spend their grants.