RuneBrush
New member
Hi all, it seems like a long time since I\'ve been about, due to various things such as real-life (which seems to just get in the way of everything).
Anyway, I\'ve finally made a concerted effort to pull my finger out and commit some time to painting mini\'s again. I\'ve replaced many paints that have gone solid, bought a number of new ones (GW foundation and GW washes) and even gone as far as buying myself a nice spangly new badger airbrush.
Now, one thing I have been mulling over the past weekend is creating a miniature painting wiki. One of my biggest problems when painting is that I will often get distracted by something when I\'m half way through a project (i.e. work) and when I come back to it a few weeks later I have no recollection of how I\'d started painting it other than a scrappy peice of paper with random letters all over it. What I was considering was creating a wiki resource that would be filled full of articles dedicated to a specific end result. For example, there are lots of different ways of painting bone, so I\'d aim to have a page that contains a picture of the end result of each of these methods, and then an article for each method that covers the paints used, step-by-step instructions and any useful comments. Finally at the end of the article there would be a list of links to other resources, such as CMoN posts, magazine articles, etc, etc.
It wouldn\'t be my intention to try and replace the plethora of guides, articles or forums that exist on the internet or in magazines, more I want to compliment them and make them more beneficial to the end user by putting them all into a logical format. I\'m hoping to get to the point where I personally try out, photograph and document methods and techniques as I find them. One bugbear I have is where I find an article in a magazine and discover that the author has clearly not used the paints/techniques they reckon they have and I\'ve now messed up the mini I was painting, by trying out articles its possible to get a much better idea of what works and what doesn\'t.
Ok, sorry for waffling
What does anybody else think about this idea? If everybody thinks is pap, then I\'ll only create a wiki for my own use, but if it could be of use to more people, then I\'ll spend a bit more time and make it a bit more user friendly and do some customisation of the wiki.
ttfn
Pete
Anyway, I\'ve finally made a concerted effort to pull my finger out and commit some time to painting mini\'s again. I\'ve replaced many paints that have gone solid, bought a number of new ones (GW foundation and GW washes) and even gone as far as buying myself a nice spangly new badger airbrush.
Now, one thing I have been mulling over the past weekend is creating a miniature painting wiki. One of my biggest problems when painting is that I will often get distracted by something when I\'m half way through a project (i.e. work) and when I come back to it a few weeks later I have no recollection of how I\'d started painting it other than a scrappy peice of paper with random letters all over it. What I was considering was creating a wiki resource that would be filled full of articles dedicated to a specific end result. For example, there are lots of different ways of painting bone, so I\'d aim to have a page that contains a picture of the end result of each of these methods, and then an article for each method that covers the paints used, step-by-step instructions and any useful comments. Finally at the end of the article there would be a list of links to other resources, such as CMoN posts, magazine articles, etc, etc.
It wouldn\'t be my intention to try and replace the plethora of guides, articles or forums that exist on the internet or in magazines, more I want to compliment them and make them more beneficial to the end user by putting them all into a logical format. I\'m hoping to get to the point where I personally try out, photograph and document methods and techniques as I find them. One bugbear I have is where I find an article in a magazine and discover that the author has clearly not used the paints/techniques they reckon they have and I\'ve now messed up the mini I was painting, by trying out articles its possible to get a much better idea of what works and what doesn\'t.
Ok, sorry for waffling
What does anybody else think about this idea? If everybody thinks is pap, then I\'ll only create a wiki for my own use, but if it could be of use to more people, then I\'ll spend a bit more time and make it a bit more user friendly and do some customisation of the wiki.
ttfn
Pete