Originally posted by freakinacage
i disagree! lol i think a few of them were good but i found them too repetative after a while. although i did like the humerous approach
I have to agree wth freak - the first two were god but the rest were pretty predictable. Didn\'t stop me from ready evey last word though.
As for the HH series: I loved the first three books, as many have. They really set the pace and mood well. The rest, well, not sure if it\'s the writers, or what but the spark just doens\'t seem to be there. Descent of Angels was pretty bad (and made no sense, I don\'t think it ever will, really) and Fulgrim, although idea wise was very interesting, just got too long - I got sick of reading about Fulgrim by the end of the book.
Mechanicum was a step back in the right direction as it shed a lot of light on something that is sitill active in the current day (heh) story line in the year M40.
For general 40K, I still think Eisenhorn and Ravenor has been the best series to date. And for some reason I really enjoyed Lord of the Night even though it\'s general panned.