freakinacage
Well-known member
sorry to the american guys here but this is soooo funny
Originally posted by forrix
wel it may be edited cleverly but there is some realy i\'m wondering what they teach in schools there?.
Originally posted by funnymouth
i dont think it is actually representative of the average american. im sure i could make citizens of any country look like idiots by conducting street interviews and editing cleverly. in fact, ill go out on a limb here, and say that these very forums contain a fairly representative group of americans. we\'re not so bad.
Originally posted by skeeve
only 20 % could explain what laser is; 13 % could define \"molecule\"
Well, I\'ve traveled around the world extensively, and have come to find that there are idiots everywhere.
However, the problem here is that we are judging others intelligence by the ability to regurgitate facts that most of them have not even looked at since high school. Question them in their chosen field and I\'d bet we\'d see more intelligent answers. (Just as I\'m sure many of us that have been out of college for some time would have trouble with trigonometry or calculus problems. Just because you needed it once, does not mean you retain it in the real world.)
Ignorance of a subject does not automatically mean someone is unintelligent.
Knowledge does not automatically make someone intelligent.
I\'ve met quite a few brilliant Physicists who are complete morons on anything outside of physics.
Originally posted by frenchkid
Originally posted by skeeve
only 20 % could explain what laser is; 13 % could define \"molecule\"
Well can\'t answer both those question. I wouldn\'t expect most people to be able to answer them.
To answer the first one you\'d have to be quit knowledgable in physiques, and to answer the second one you\'d have to be studying biology or be a biologist.
And Physiques and Biologie were to of my main subjects in highschool, and I passed with pretty good grades. I\'m pretty sure at one point I could have given a rougth definiton of a molecule. And as I did some light physique, I have a rougth Idea of what a laser is, but nowhere near enougth to explain scientificly what it is. Quit franckly I don\'t really see how these questions are relevant.
The sun one is a bit scary though, I\'d still like too see how they are asked and how the people are picked out. And I hope the question would be a bit more precise then that. Because there is nothing wrong in saying that the sun turns around the earth, just a question of referencial.
I would tend to agree with Evil dave. But I think it can be agrees on that there is a Minimum General culture requirement that should be attained by everyone. People not knowing what E=MC^2 is all about don\'t bother me. Those who don\'t know who you are talking about when you say galileo, Newton, or Giordano Bruno leave me a bit more perplex.