By touring, ticket sales and merchandise is the artists bread and butter. Artists make very little from actual CD sales.Originally posted by AinuLainour
How the fu*k is one going to make a successful living out of music now?! :flame:
Out of curiosity, what do you mean by \"successful\"?Originally posted by AinuLainour
How the fu*k is one going to make a successful living out of music now?! :flame:
Originally posted by fieldarchy
yup tis true. The CD sales are just a little extra in the equation. For the most part the trick is getting the music on the radio, creating a fan base and then have the demand for large venue concerts selling \"limited edition\" souvenirs for high price at the concerts themselves. That\'s where the money is.
Oh, well hell, dude, then the loss of CD sales will not hurt the average artist at all.Originally posted by AinuLainour
Originally posted by fieldarchy
yup tis true. The CD sales are just a little extra in the equation. For the most part the trick is getting the music on the radio, creating a fan base and then have the demand for large venue concerts selling \"limited edition\" souvenirs for high price at the concerts themselves. That\'s where the money is.
Fair enough
@Evil Dave - That\'d be very successful imo. Successful is being able to rely on music as one would on your average career.
So by that would you class the hundreds of thousands of Session musicians and Music teachers as Successful or Unsuccesful?Originally posted by AinuLainour Successful is being able to rely on music as one would on your average career.
Hmmm, this implies that musos can\'t just make music, they actually have to be entertainers too. Somebody had better tell REM that squinting as you mumble into an under-amplified microphone is not en tertainment. *grumble*Originally posted by Evil Dave
By touring, ticket sales and merchandise is the artists bread and butter. Artists make very little from actual CD sales.
Success. Success and The Big Time are two different thing, me thinks. I\'ve heard some astoundingly brilliant musicians play, yet they\'re not \'discovered\' or signed up. Perhaps it\'s because they\'re musicians and not just entertainers that can chirrup and whistle if they\'ve eaten enough budgie seed.Originally posted by Dragonsreach
So by that would you class the hundreds of thousands of Session musicians and Music teachers as Successful or Unsuccesful?
Sure they can, and they always could, but without touring they never really made a huge amount of money.Originally posted by Modderrhu
Hmmm, this implies that musos can\'t just make music, they actually have to be entertainers too. Somebody had better tell REM that squinting as you mumble into an under-amplified microphone is not entertainment. *grumble*Originally posted by Evil Dave
By touring, ticket sales and merchandise is the artists bread and butter. Artists make very little from actual CD sales.
Originally posted by fieldarchy
Way cool! Thanks for sharing!
Which from my perspective, could be a bad thing all round. I\'m far less likely to go watch a band live, than I am to go to an opera, or ballet. Saw a production of The Magic Flute last year that still has me enthralled. That could well change, however, if we do see that revival of real talent.Originally posted by Evil Dave
Sure they can, and they always could, but without touring they never really made a huge amount of money.
I see this as a good thing for those bands that sound good live, and not so good for those that only sound good in the studio.
In other words, we may see some real talent come out like they had in the 60\'s and 70\'s before they had the intensive studio mixing.
There are few albums that I\'d buy so that I could have all the music on them. Most have two or three good tunes and the rest is pretty much filler. I wonder what will happen to those filler tunes if they never got sold with the good ones.Originally posted by Torn blue sky
Funny thing is, yeah i\'ll DL tracks, but I really like having the album!