Neil Hodgson\'s Stealth Suit from New WD

EricJ

Active member
haha, I could try something like this, and THEN add a painted reflection of it somehow...then there would be 2 techniques completely dependent on 1 and only 1 perspective.
 

EricJ

Active member
Originally posted by supervike
Still though...amazing, and most likely trendsetting...:cool:

I think it very well might be, I am sure a lot of people have thought about doing something like this, but it really takes someone with great skill to come out with an example which really displays how something like this can be done. I\'ve wrestled in my mind from time to time about how to make this illusion work, but seeing this puts a lot of pieces together in my head in terms of actually maybe pulling it off one day.
 

Kraan

New member
Seen this very morning on WD.
Amazing!!
But it works only from this angle as other pictures showing different angles, revealed the \"painted\" invisibility.
 

vincegamer

Active member
While it certainly displays a great deal of skill and work, I fail to see the point.
Clearly, if you move even the slightest amount in any direction the illusion will be ruined. In fact, even standing at just the right angle it might not work because your eyes will detect the depth difference in person.

So, if you\'re just doing it to create a photograph, you could get exactly the same effect by painting the figure and background solidly, photographing the background and then putting the figure in place and double exposing the same frame.

I suppose it is interesting as a matter of personal challenge, but not for producing a 3-D object.

I think it would be more interesting to create an image that is only recognizable from a specific angle but doesn\'t look out of place from other angles, like the arrangement of rocks in the movie Labarynth that from one angle form a portrait of David Bowie.
 

Starks333

New member
Originally posted by vincegamer
While it certainly displays a great deal of skill and work, I fail to see the point.
Clearly, if you move even the slightest amount in any direction the illusion will be ruined. In fact, even standing at just the right angle it might not work because your eyes will detect the depth difference in person.

So, if you\'re just doing it to create a photograph, you could get exactly the same effect by painting the figure and background solidly, photographing the background and then putting the figure in place and double exposing the same frame.

I suppose it is interesting as a matter of personal challenge, but not for producing a 3-D object.

I think it would be more interesting to create an image that is only recognizable from a specific angle but doesn\'t look out of place from other angles, like the arrangement of rocks in the movie Labarynth that from one angle form a portrait of David Bowie.


***the point is it looks awesome, it looks like a stealth suit in stealth mode, which is awesome

stealth in movies DOES bend light and look awkward if you look close enough, and i think it would be almost possible to do this, as all you need to do is paint the sides different to blend in with the background on all 4 sides of him

ex. rear of marine would have bush thats in front of him, left side would have say a tree, right side would have dirt and air, front would have the cliff behind him

of course it would look awkward outside of a display, or turned the wrong way, but thats the point of a display, its for display

i suggested something like this for a games day entry, except on a single mini, eldar ranger with chameleoline cloak...would look awesome if done right

Starks
 

OrkyDave

New member
I am so glad someone else has posted this, I saw it about half an hour ago and logged on to tell y\'all about it!

If anyone is attempting to try this I would reccomend buying the magazine, the pictures from the other angle shows how he followed the natural curves of the model to achieve the straight lines and help it blend in with the background. (They actually included the pic from the other angle to prove that it was DONE BY AN EXTREMLEY TALENTED ARTIST and not some gimp pissing around with photoshop.)

@ vincegamer, the point is that it\'s a truly great painted mini and such an original, and clever idea, very difficult to execute, and I\'m taking an educated guess something challenging for the painter . What was the point in Van Gough painting his sunflowers when he could have just picked some from his garden and stuck em in a vase to look at?

I\'ll get off from my high horse now...
 

StarFyre

Active member
that is awesome...

As a side note, according to a WD from some months ago, GW believes the next big thing in painting, will be \"On source reflections\" or something.

Basically, if I hold a sword up in the air, and am holding a mirror shield and let\'s say bright shiny armour, if we assume the sword is a flaming sword, there should be a reflection of the sword itself on the mirror shield and all over the metallic armour that can draw a line to the shield as well as the light reflections from the flames onto the armour.

RIght now, people don\'t paint the reflections of the model itself onto itself (onto any areas that should relfect its self).

I wish I could do any of this :)

Sanjay
 

freakinacage

Well-known member
i don\'t care how practical it is, it must take a helluva lot of skill to do this and it looks hot from that angle!
 

DaN

New member
What WOULD be interesting to see, would be a sniper or scout or something with a cameleoline (Sic?) cloak, so that you can see the background \"through\" the cloak, but also see the figure beneath through gaps, etc...

I may have to sketch this to show what I mean... It makes sense in MY mind!! :p
 

drizzt

Member
OK. This is impossible. This is beyond any reason. How good can a painter get?
I\'m starting to fear... insanity :p
 

Avelorn

Sven Jonsson
Originally posted by StarFyre
Right now, people don\'t paint the reflections of the model itself onto itself (onto any areas that should relfect its self).

*coughlookinmygallerycoughcough*

Alexi_Z has done it on her Eowyn a few GD\'s back (at least i think it\'s ment to be her hair reflected in the sword.. I saw it after completing my own version of the effect), Martin Footit as well. His elf from last years GD had some very convincing reflections of the gold into the silver.

I\'ll go and buy the dwarf tomorrow! :)
 

DaN

New member
What I meant was something like this ghillie suit, but without the actual grass stuck on - just so that it LOOKS like that, but you can still see the sniper\'s face/weapon at certain angles etc...

 

freakinacage

Well-known member
i got fed up with all the obvious snipers just standing there taking pot shots so i made my own with ghillie capes:
import041.jpg


it\'s a crap picture but you get the idea. basically i made a shape out of gs, covered it in a cape and added scenery stuff to it much like a proper sniper would. you can\'t see it in the pix but the barrels just stick out under the cape edge
 

funnymouth

Active member
well, ive tried somthing similar(here), but this is amazing! the part that really impresses me is the rear leg. i cant tell where the foot stops and the leg continues.

idea: what if you tried this technique on a base qith a symmetrical backdrop - like a riveted cylinder with repeated horzontal or vertical lines - the illusion might work from several angles then.
 
Back To Top
Top