New Star Trek trailers

No Such Agency

New member
Hmm...\"Syler\" makes a good Spock, at least in looks. This punky young Kirk, I dunno... There\'s more to being JTK than just acting like an irresponsible ass (though that certainly helps).
 

Aliengod3

Active member
Ya the older star trek movies were just one and half hour TV shows in my opinion. This new movie looks like they put some effort into making it. Cannot wait to see it.
 

Bigdennis52

New member
Originally posted by Aliengod3
Ya the older star trek movies were just one and half hour TV shows in my opinion. This new movie looks like they put some effort into making it. Cannot wait to see it.

I agree. The old star trek movies really did not have a movie feel at all

This looks good. I cant wait
 

Jericho

Consummate Brushlicker
Simon Pegg? Sure, why not! Pretty strange mix of actors. Definitely a few I\'m not familiar with though.

You guys are right though, it looks like they actually put some thought/effort into things so far. Could be decent. This is an odd-number Trek movie though, right? That\'s usually not a good thing :p
 

ScottRadom

Shogun of Saskatchewan
Nice trailer! Not a big Abrams fan but the trailer looked appealing. Still waiting for the first re-done series to hit Blu-Ray along with Wrath of Khan. Man sony is taking their time getting all the HDDVD stuff brought over.

-yells in communicator-
SSSSOOOOOOONNNNNNYYYYYYYYY!
 

rocketandroll

New member
Originally posted by Jericho
Simon Pegg? Sure, why not! Pretty strange mix of actors. Definitely a few I\'m not familiar with though.

You guys are right though, it looks like they actually put some thought/effort into things so far. Could be decent. This is an odd-number Trek movie though, right? That\'s usually not a good thing :p


\"Just like every odd-numbered Star Trek movie is crap\"

Simon Pegg, Spaced.

Ohhhhhh, the irony!!! :)

But I personally think it\'s gonna be pretty awesome. The franchise needed to be totally re-invented to make a good film of it, and taking it mega-big-budget hollywood and getting in a completely new cast is a pretty good way to do it IMHO.

The trouble with all the other films is, transitioning an entire cast from a TV series to the big screen just doesn\'t ever seem to work... I am hopeful.

Though somewhat p*ssed off that after waiting for this for a couple of years the damn launch date isn\'t until May next year!! Just release the damn film when it\'s ready!!!!!! :)


Ben

PS: Ok, gonna raise my geek level here, even for this audience but... does anyone know how (or if) the new film is meant to fit into the existing chronology of the Star Trek universe? ie: is it meant to be before or after \'Enterprise\'? Or have they just said \"Screw everything that\'s gone before, lets boldly go and start from scratch\"??
 

PegaZus

Stealth Freak
Originally posted by rocketandroll
PS: Ok, gonna raise my geek level here, even for this audience but... does anyone know how (or if) the new film is meant to fit into the existing chronology of the Star Trek universe? ie: is it meant to be before or after \'Enterprise\'? Or have they just said \"Screw everything that\'s gone before, lets boldly go and start from scratch\"??
It appears that they\'re staying true to the movies that have occurred, and it isn\'t a reboot, but that they aren\'t compelled to stick with the canon (ie, Enterprise was built on the ground). I imagine that a lot of the things from Enterprise are going to go by the wayside, and it\'ll be more true to TOS. The wikipedia article has a lot of info. Big point I saw was that a lot of the inspiration was from Spock\'s World and Prime Directive. We\'ll see.
 

PegaZus

Stealth Freak
Originally posted by DaN
It\'s not gonna have uber-gay opening music like \"Enterprise\" is it? :(
Actually, the wikipedia did say that Liza Minelli and Barbara Streisand were doing a duet for the opening titled \"Love of a Lifetime\", written by Barry Manilow and Don Woods.
 
Back To Top
Top