E
elouchard
Guest
Fredy,
I had a feeling that the low quality water-based metallics were causing people to have a bad feeling about metallics in general. Now that I think about it, good old testors metallics used to give me better results than what I get with GW paint.
I agree about both methods being useful depending on the situation.
Now, about this thread. It seems to be getting longer but what exactly is it accomplishing? I think if one asks the top painters on this site, one would find that they use both NMM and metallics. I think a thread about how people accomplish certain effects using both techniques would be more useful to people that a discussion of the relative merits of a style.
I think I\'ll start one and see what happens. It will be a nice test to see if top painters really do guard their secrets.
Eric
I had a feeling that the low quality water-based metallics were causing people to have a bad feeling about metallics in general. Now that I think about it, good old testors metallics used to give me better results than what I get with GW paint.
I agree about both methods being useful depending on the situation.
Now, about this thread. It seems to be getting longer but what exactly is it accomplishing? I think if one asks the top painters on this site, one would find that they use both NMM and metallics. I think a thread about how people accomplish certain effects using both techniques would be more useful to people that a discussion of the relative merits of a style.
I think I\'ll start one and see what happens. It will be a nice test to see if top painters really do guard their secrets.
Eric