Odd paint jobs

Dedwrekka

New member
I was wondering if anyone would give a bad score to a mini that was painted against what the norm of it was. Say something like purple ork skin, or majorly contrasting colors on a mini.
 

DennisMech

New member
Originally posted by Dedwrekka
I was wondering if anyone would give a bad score to a mini that was painted against what the norm of it was. Say something like purple ork skin, or majorly contrasting colors on a mini.
Purple ork skin?? you can\'t do that!!
I might score a mini lower if it was painted in such colors that it hurt the overall look of it, or it was too distracting or out of place. But generaly I think it\'s up to the painter to decide.
 

kittykat23uk

New member
It depends. If the colour choice just doesn\'t go with the sculpt of the model (such as bright green on wolfen skin), then I would probably vote it lower. Colour choice is just one aspect along with neatness, imagination, technical skill and overall composition etc. that all combine to help me to determine what to vote.

Regards

Kat
 

alexgrunt

New member
Message original : Dedwrekka
I was wondering if anyone would give a bad score to a mini that was painted against what the norm of it was. Say something like purple ork skin, or majorly contrasting colors on a mini.

Like this one?

I actually think green is better than the \"fluffy\" red skin associated with bloodletters...
 

finn18

New member
Good question...

I would probably actually vote higher for someone who broke away from the fluff and did something different. Provided the overall scheme \'worked\'.
 
G

G-nome

Guest
The cute ickle wood spwite awwwww
oooosa wooosee? Wanna ickle bikkit?
.....erm....anyway.......
Depends on the skill of the painter. If its done well in the case of the ickle bwoodwetter its painted well and would not score less from me for a non fluffy paint scheme. Even somekind of dayglo ( anyone remember those socks? ) for skaven although pushing it a little if done competnent..compit..... .well enough will not score lower than a \"normal\"scheme. Though painting space marines pink will get you shot.
(runs off to get warm milk and bikkies)
 

Caelithar

New member
Personally I don\'t think that the colour of fantasy creatures skin is written in stone . One person way back when decided that green for an orc might work and stuck with it , if it started out pink , then today that would be the norm and people would laugh at green :) , but I digress . If , like has already been said , the paintjob is solid no matter the colour , then I don\'t see why it should be marked down . Putting a story with their paintjob and explain why its purple may also help .
 

dauber22

New member
Originally posted by G-nome
....Though painting space marines pink will get you shot.

Oh, I don\'t know. WHat about the Barbie Space Marine??? That\'s one of my all-time favorites! lol lol

On topic, though, I think this group in general is more open-minded than to grade lower for not following the \"fluff\". That\'s not to say that there aren\'t any self-appointed \"Fluff Police\" out there who mught snipe your score, but I think that the painters here are more worried about the quality of the paint job than adherance to fluff
 
I agree... often for me the fact that a paint job differs from the norm catches the eye more.
I will always score based on the finished effect and skill level... I never score low for a variant colour scheme.
 

Valander

Member
Originally posted by finn18
I would probably actually vote higher for someone who broke away from the fluff and did something different. Provided the overall scheme \'worked\'.

I agree. If something is original, it often gets a point higher than the same model, at the same painting skill-level, painted exactly like the pictures in the book.

However, the colors do have to work, and the painting has to be done well. You won\'t get an extra point from me for doing hot-pink ork flesh, for example; it just wouldn\'t look right! (But...try to prove me wrong! Do one up this way and make it look good, and I\'ll give you a good vote!)
 

Dragonsreach

Super Moderator
Staff member
Originally posted by finn18
I would probably actually vote higher for someone who broke away from the fluff and did something different. Provided the overall scheme \'worked\'.
And I repeat my question \"What colour are the Blood Angels....?\"

But as has been said there are no hard and fast rules about fantasy colour schemes. It all depends on the \'feasibility\' of the colours to the model and personal choice.
Who remembers the Green & Blue skinned aliens in the Original \"Star Trek\" did they look feasible. While with the more recent aliens, while a more flesh like colour, I have had serious doubts about the evolutionary benefits of some of the facial structures.
 

finn18

New member
And I repeat my answer...

Originally posted by Dragonsreach
And I repeat my question \"What colour are the Blood Angels....?\"
Red, you bastard, red!!:D

I am keeping a tight hold on my chain at the moment, to stop it from being yanked:flip:

It would be a bit silly however, to paint a squad of marines green and call them \'Blood Angels\'. Fluff aside, they would more likely be \'Snot Angels\':D

Perhaps with a Primarch called Sunusitis???
 

No Such Agency

New member
That\'s not to say that there aren\'t any self-appointed \"Fluff Police\" out there who mught snipe your score...

The term is Fluffers (obscure but rude).

One person way back when decided that green for an orc might work and stuck with it...
And the person you\'re thinking of was NOT named \"Tolkien\" ;) I don\'t believe he said orcs are green. The Peter Jackson movie orcs were pretty close to his concept of the species - an extreme caricature of all the ignorant, cruel men of the world. Were green orcs GW\'s invention?
 

Rab

Member
And the person you\'re thinking of was NOT named \"Tolkien\" ;) I don\'t believe he said orcs are green. The Peter Jackson movie orcs were pretty close to his concept of the species - an extreme caricature of all the ignorant, cruel men of the world. Were green orcs GW\'s invention?

Nah, D&D had green Orcs way before GW. Anybody remember 1st edition MERP? It had purple Orcs on the box art. lol

Rab.
 

darthfoley

Active member
Originally posted by Rab

And the person you\'re thinking of was NOT named \"Tolkien\" ;) I don\'t believe he said orcs are green. The Peter Jackson movie orcs were pretty close to his concept of the species - an extreme caricature of all the ignorant, cruel men of the world. Were green orcs GW\'s invention?

Nah, D&D had green Orcs way before GW. Anybody remember 1st edition MERP? It had purple Orcs on the box art. lol

Rab.

Here\'s the D&D description, straight from the Monster Manual:

Orcs appear particularly disgusting because their coloration - brown or greenish brown with a bluish sheen - highlights their pinkish snouts and ears.

So...there ya go.
 

Dedwrekka

New member
That was the old ork scheme when they were more pig-like. GW only changed it slightly by shortening the snout so much that it looks like it was cut off.

I\'d like to make a blueish pink ork skintone, but I find that I\'m surprisingly horrible at blending skintones on that scale. I\'m much better at the heresy stuff.
 
P

provoke_me

Guest
backing away...

backing away from ork coloration and getting back to the topic..i do not rate down for odd colors...or sculpting(large breasts!) but if it is badly done..or somehow doesnt seem to benefit the model at all...i say its poo..and i post a comment trying to explain why its poo...
also..i have recently decided that unbased models get no more than 5...most likely a 4 though..anywho...yeah
 

Sand Rat

New member
Originally posted by darthfoley
Here\'s the D&D description, straight from the Monster Manual:

Orcs appear particularly disgusting because their coloration - brown or greenish brown with a bluish sheen - highlights their pinkish snouts and ears.

So...there ya go.


Damn, and I thought the ork I was painting blue would be original - oh well, second place again. :D
 
Back To Top
Top