Please tell me this isn\'t real!! What are they thinking allowing this?

redarmy27

New member
Oh boy. This could be messed up. Coming from a legal background, it\'s difficult enough when people bicker over one legal system, let alone bickering over where two legal systems overlap.
 

Legacy Account

Active member
Chief, that post is wrong on so many levels....

:(

Edit: The fact that you can\'t spell your name right says it all though I guess.

People wonder why I left the UK....:D
 

Dragonsreach

Super Moderator
Staff member
Scolar
I had to remove your posting as it breached the Terms and Conditions of this site.


I\'m extremely dismayed, disatisfied and disgusted that this has taken place in such an underhand manner.
If Turkey, a Muslim Country, refuses to allow Shar\'ia courts why do WE now have two seperate court systems?
 

Legacy Account

Active member
@ Mike: I can see why you pulled the comment, but I think it\'s a shame in some ways. I would have liked to have seen what everyone had to say on the matter.
 

Dragonsreach

Super Moderator
Staff member
Scott:
In some repects I agree with your point of view regarding the comment.
However it was a clear breach of the T&C\'s and I couldn\'t allow it to remain.
 

Legacy Account

Active member
Totally understand. Would just have liked to have seen chappie learn a lesson or two, that\'s all.

The UK hasn\'t got a chance if that\'s the sort of attitude that\'s taken. Sad thing is, I can hear the sounds of the unwashed masses clamouring to put their Xs in the wrong boxes from here....
 

mattsterbenz

New member
I can only hope the politicians who put this into place get their heads screwed back on and switch it back to one court system. Imagine all the confusion that\'s going to come of this. Redarmy said it right.

One country = one court system.

-Matt
 

Dragonsreach

Super Moderator
Staff member
Originally posted by Spacemunkie
Totally understand. Would just have liked to have seen chappie learn a lesson or two, that\'s all.
I\'m in too foul a mood to day to allow a slanging match to start.

The UK hasn\'t got a chance if that\'s the sort of attitude that\'s taken. Sad thing is, I can hear the sounds of the unwashed masses clamouring to put their Xs in the wrong boxes from here....
And that is the truth. The \"Reactionary\" press will target this, the extremeist will jump on the bandwagon and the eaily swayed will fall into line.
Please let us not forget how easily the NAZI party swept into power in 1930\'s Germany.
 

Avelorn

Sven Jonsson
I\'m speechless.

What will be the consequence will be is hard to foresee though. I just think that the rising extremist opinions in both camps will have fuel to their fire. Crap.
 

medved1980

New member
please remember folks that in english law you have the right to contest the \'juristiction\' of a court. this means that sharia law is not in effect.

sharia law will be used as a common law system just like various mediation processes. and wherever there is a conflict or disagreement in the processes the persons concerned can apply to the courts to review the decision under \'english law\'

the UK courts have ultimate sway over whether the decisions of the sharia courts can be enforced or not.

i dont think there should be a big panic. it\'s a bit like devolved council powers, you still have the option to contest the decision to a higher level (and thus get it in the english courts)
 

Avelorn

Sven Jonsson
@Stuart: Yes definitely true. But I don\'t think any court should rule on basis of another law all together. I\'m sure there is no reason to panic but... how will this be used? Will it sway people\'s opinion in favour of extremist views? I\'m mostly worried over that.
 

krom1415

Active member
Surely there is a way of expressing our disatisfaction at this appaling idea, anyone know how to get a petition via email to the pm.
Whens the next boat to New Zealandlol:D
 

generulpoleaxe

New member
it\'s already done in the jewish comunities and that hasn\'t brought about the down fall of uk society.

the media is blowing it out of proportion as they still have to obey uk law.
they just have a religious leader deal with marital problems including divorce unless it gets bad enough that they decide the police are needed.
people involved can still go to the police if they wish, and the police can interveen any time they wish.

it has helped keep the peece many times in jewish comunities, so why not muslim ones?
 

darklord

New member
the danger is if this parallels the british law that stands and also the other thing that springs to mind is wether decisions based on sharia contravene standard law. (ie sexual discrimination,etc)

of course there is a distinct danger this could make the muslim community more distant from the mainstream. If i moved to sweden or somewhere i would expect to abide by those rules, try and learn that language and integrate into the countries community, i certainly dont expect any special treatment
 

Infidel Castro

New member
Originally posted by generulpoleaxe
it\'s already done in the jewish comunities and that hasn\'t brought about the down fall of uk society.

the media is blowing it out of proportion as they still have to obey uk law.
they just have a religious leader deal with marital problems including divorce unless it gets bad enough that they decide the police are needed.
people involved can still go to the police if they wish, and the police can interveen any time they wish.

it has helped keep the peece many times in jewish comunities, so why not muslim ones?

Quite right.

I\'m disappointed that some responses here have been so negative and knee-jerk. If it\'s alright for the Jews to have had that sort of alternative for a century then it\'s not a problem to see it happen for the Muslims. In black and white terms it\'s either all or nothing - rescind any arrangement the Jews have whilst telling the Muslims to bugger off at the same time, or give them the same option through their own systems. These things happen and cultures develop and evolve. If you can\'t deal with that then that\'s your own problem.
 

Mr.S.Marbo

New member
I think it\'s all a bit out of proportion. It appears to me that both parties have to agree to use this method of arbitration in the first place and it\'s only civil cases. That appears to me to meant that if one person involved doesn\'t want to use this method of arbitration then it\'s not enforceable.

If you don\'t want to do it then you don\'t have to, and British law is what governs the UK. If you don\'t want to try and settle your civil dispute through this way then you don\'t have to. \"British law is absolute..\" as the quote says.

These aren\'t court rulings it\'s arbitration. If one of these \"tribunals\" came out with something that falls foul of a UK law then the UK courts and European Court of Justice wouldn\'t uphold it.

I don\'t think it\'s a big deal. I am more concerned with the fact the UK is happy to extradite it\'s own citizens to other countries for offences committed while the suspect was in the UK without the other country having to prove anything to the UK courts (apart from the fact they\'d like to have this person because they think he\'s been naughty).
 

Avelorn

Sven Jonsson
I have the same opinion about Jewish courts actually or any other private arrangement. But I have to say I don\'t know how it works in the UK so I could be over-reacting. I agree with Reverend that either it is all or nothing and I put my vote in for nothing.
 
Back To Top
Top