Boy I wonder about this. Mine you this is just my observations.
One. It sure doesn\'t look to me that the Brit is bounded to the mast of the ship. The pictures show that everything (from the angle) above a certain point is painted white, and he is against a blue background. I would say that he is at either the stern or on one of the sides of the boathouse.
Two. They where bound with ropes? Again from the picture, Someone has to go back to rope and knot tieing class again. The has to be the one of the worst binding that I\'ve ever seen. Plus as the insert shows of the mans wrist, He is bounded with quick ties to the inside railing, so why would they have to tie him up with rope? I\'m a thinking that the Captain of the fishing vessel was right, and the two men where planing to bind up the props in rope. Again that\'s my view on that.
Three. From the sounds of things, the two men did board the vessel without permission , which does sound like \"piratecy\" to me (I don\'t have any sort of laws of the high seas to double check that, but if that is the case isn\'t the Captain well within his legal right to confine the two men until they can be turned over to the proper authorities?
Four. Who\'s going to take anyone with a Rebel symbol painted on their headgear seriously?
I\'m not trying to make any point on whaling (good or bad), just trying to figger out who\'s right and wrong, and who full of it. Sorry, but the story of the \"Greenpeacers\" sounds a little fishy (pun intended)