Woohoo!!! new toys!

matty1001

New member
The manfrotto is almost 1kg lighter, and has a taller max height. If it were out of them two that would be the one I would go for.

They are decent bits of kit as well, I just wish I had the money to buy one. At the moment I am lugging around an old Stitz HL-31.
 

Orb

procrastinator
I love these discussions........

I\'m going to get a new tripod, and i\'m thinking one of these Manfrotto 190 series tripods.......oh carbon fibre sounds nice but so much for about 1/2kg weight saving over the aluminium!
Manfrotto Tripod

but even then...what type of head?

Still using my Canon 20D.......sounds so old now; was tempted to upgrade to a 40D but think I\'ll hang out to see what replaces the 5D..........

which again affects decisions on what wide angle zoom to get - the sigma 10-20mm one is an APS designed one......

love this subject....I\'m now exploring HDR images and mucking around with old RAW files to see what I can come up with!

thanks guys
 

squidders

New member
I have (I think) http://www.warehouseexpress.com/product/default.aspx?sku=1019782 that one and a manfrotto monopod so it\'ll take the same attachments.
 

Legacy Account

Active member
Can I retract what I said about Marumi filters? Perhaps I just need one of the more expensive Marumis....

Put it on my 70-200 (on my now arrived 40D :D) and had a play. Forgot it was on there and started shooting at 200mm/f4. Bloody thing wouldn\'t focus!

I\'m thinking it\'s my nice new 40D body as the lens worked fine the other day. I stick the lens on my 400D and lo and behold, same results. BASTARD! I\'m thinking that the lens is going to have to go back - all my other lenses are working just fine.

Sat fuming for two hours, then suddenly realise I\'d stuck the CPL on the end yesterday and hadn\'t tested that. Off it comes and back come the razor sharp focus/images.

Guess I\'m going to have to splash on filters that do the optics justice. Saying that, I\'ve just whacked a cheap UV on it and that works fine.

At least the Marumi doesn\'t screw my 17-50 up too much. I\'ll use it on that. Hoya or more expensive it is for L lenses then :)
 

Roger Bunting

New member
I found the marumi dhg filters on ebay. A few quid more expensive than the one you linked to, munkie, but I\'m guessing they should work better.
 

Legacy Account

Active member
Originally posted by Roger Bunting
I found the marumi dhg filters on ebay. A few quid more expensive than the one you linked to, munkie, but I\'m guessing they should work better.

Sod it, I\'m just going to splash on a B&W. The lens deserves it :D
 

Legacy Account

Active member
Definitely! Those DHG ones\'ll most probably be good enough for my needs as well. They\'ve got them in my local shop, might ask for a test.

Speaking of that Tammy, I haven\'t used it much recently (at all really), but I just slapped it on my camera today and it\'s a cracker! very crisp and lovely DOF wide open. Makes a nice little portrait lens.
 

squidders

New member
I just use Hoya filters... never had a problem and never really noticed the price...

If you have the 70-200 Canon lens I\'m guessing it\'s about £1500 odd... why so thrifty with the filter?
 

Legacy Account

Active member
1500 quid? No chance.

Picked up a new 70-200 f4L for less than 400 quid! No way I\'m dropping that sort of money on gear. Most expensive lens I\'ve got my sights on is a 100-400 and those are doable for less than 800 quid.

It wasn\'t a case of saving money - I\'ve used those Marumis on my other lenses and they\'ve worked fine. It\'s either a duffer or just that the lens is so good it shows the filter up for what it is!
 

atacam

New member
Originally posted by Spacemunkie
Originally posted by Roger Bunting

A random cow, shortly before pooing:

You or the cow?

The cow....

COWPOO.jpg

All that money wasted on a camera, when all you can do is take crap photoslol
 

squidders

New member
Originally posted by Spacemunkie
1500 quid? No chance.

Picked up a new 70-200 f4L for less than 400 quid! No way I\'m dropping that sort of money on gear. Most expensive lens I\'ve got my sights on is a 100-400 and those are doable for less than 800 quid.

It wasn\'t a case of saving money - I\'ve used those Marumis on my other lenses and they\'ve worked fine. It\'s either a duffer or just that the lens is so good it shows the filter up for what it is!

Aaaaah! I thought you meant the f/2.8 70-200 IS one... I\'ll get my coat.
 

Roger Bunting

New member
EOS 400d
sigma 50mm macro (mainly for minis but to learn macro photography. If I get into it I\'ll buy a longer focal length macro later for wildlife).
tamron 17-50
manfotto digi 728B tripod
hoya UV pro1d filters
marumi dhg cpl filters
2 spare batteries (it was a twin-pack offer)
2 CF cards
remote
some lens cleaning stuff
lowepro nova2 case
 

Roger Bunting

New member
Well, the 400d was out of stock when I ordered it from 7 day shop and so was the tamron lens fro warehouse express (from whom I also ordered the \'pod and lowepro case). Those four items are what I\'m waiting for but I have the rest of the stuff. I\'ve checked over the Sigma lens and I can\'t find anything that may be wrong with it. I\'m not sure what the issues are that you mentioned about their quality control but it seems I have a good one.
 
Back To Top
Top