Originally posted by treide
Fantasy for me.
I am intrigued by the discussion point about different types of fantasy, in particular the comments about D&D fantasy not being up to snuff in some way.
At least for some of us older site members D&D was one of the earliest examples of fantasy translated into gaming system. I never actually played the game when I was younger, but I absolutely devoured all the material I could get my hands on because of the fantasy element.
I may be wrong, but aren\'t many of the creatures/monsters/races in the D&D \"universe\" based on creatures/monsters/races from various cultural stories/legends/myths? Of course certain critters were just created for the game, but if the ideas were well executed, why are they any less interesting or valuable?
This is, of course, completely subjective. Personally, I am not very keen on the archetypical DnD or fantasy novel cover artwork type fantasy imagery. I like my fantasy darker, grittier and more \"real\", if you see what I mean. I am much more intrigued by creatures like Gollum, or the mini I showed previously, than by \"fantastical\" monsters like cockatrices, griffons, unicorns etc. Like Jim, I\'m more fond of the way magic is described in LOTR (where they hardly ever use it), than in many modern fantasy novels (or RPGs), where magicians battle it out with spectacular spells and such.
In a way, I guess I want fantasy to be less fantastical, so that it could almost be real.
That being said, this is my
favourite style of fantasy, and it doesn\'t mean I don\'t like anything that falls outside of this frame.
And, of course, I like other genres as well: steampunk, horror, post-apocalyptic, even historic. I do however have slight aversion to sci-fi. I don\'t know why, and I\'ve tried numerous times to get into it. But, I just don\'t seem to be able to. :~(