Can mini painting be art ?

Ritual

New member
Originally posted by degra
well that´s why you can´t say that there is one \"art\" but different artforms.
it´s like you want to compare classic music with experimental techno ethnopunk lol - it´s all music, but in different forms ;)
Of course there\'s different art forms, but contemporary art seems to have a totally different \"agenda\" than, for instance, renaissance art. So, my point is to look at what artists today mean with art, rather than what art was about in the 15th century.
 

degra

New member
what artists today mean with art, rather than what art was about in the 15th century.

well, in the 15th century they were considered as craftmans and not artists, quite comparable to illustration and design nowadays - there are much more things that are considered as \"art\" nowadays than in the past, besides contemporary art (or cerebral/conceptual art) - i even think, that it would be far easier nowadays to be considered as an \"miniature artist\" then it was hundred years ago. nowadays the mentality is quite more tolerant and open for different things, not that limited like in the past....and that´s partly an achievement of the avant garde in the art, which a lot of people are considering as \"crap\"...
 

Ritual

New member
@degra
Well, that makes my point even clearer... because I have always thought miniature painting was more like illustration than fine art, and if the renaissance artists (which almost everyone refers to in this argument) also were considered illustrators then so much better! :D

To round things up, I think we agree pretty much on this subject, Edgar, since we both mostly want to enjoy this hobby and not bother about the labels. :)
(BTW, I\'m putting the finishing touches on one of your sculpts, at this very moment... :))
 

degra

New member
yep, i agree that we have the same point of view - waaahhhhh i m really impatient to see the painted version:bouncy::flip::bouncy::drunk:lol;)
 
Back To Top
Top