No Such Agency
New member
Man, I don\'t know where this idea arose that privatizing ANYTHING makes it better for people. To quote Lt. Ellen Ripley \"I don\'t know which species is worse. You don\'t see THEM screwing each other over for a goddamn percentage.\" Businesses are in business to make money. And usually to make the maximum possible profit, every quarter, all the time. Traditionally they try their damnedest to do this by providing the shittiest possible product/service, for the maximum sellable price. When they have to compete, they do so not by making the product better, but by trying to out-market (ie lie more convincingly than) the competition, or by dirty tricks, or by simply being big enough to loss-lead the other guy into bankruptcy.Originally posted by philologus
There\'s no doubts that parents should bear more responsibility than many do. However; having to choose which school to place their kids in and having to move when the little brats screw it up is a good incentive to be involved. Additionally competition would allow schools to charge additional tuition for \"problem\" students, frequent transfers etc. This removes the burden of teachers and other students from having to deal with disorderly students and their inadequate parents.
If you think having pop machines and advertising in schools is bad now... imagine what it would be like in any private school that was affordable by the poor or lower middle class. Give me bureaucratic, stodgy government any day.
/rant off... hmm this thread brings out the Fark.com in me